Automaton vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Torry Harris Integration Solutions Logo
112 views|84 comparisons
Parasoft Logo
815 views|564 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automaton and Parasoft SOAtest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
  • "The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
  • "I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
  • "It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
  • "We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
  • "The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
  • "They do have a confusing licensing structure."
  • "The price is around $5,000 USD."
  • More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.
    Top Answer:Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be… more »
    Ranking
    41st
    Views
    112
    Comparisons
    84
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    23rd
    Views
    815
    Comparisons
    564
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    440
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SOAtest
    Learn More
    Overview

    An illustrative test automation tool with a code-less approach towards end-to-end application testing. Visual flow-based approaches for test cases makes it tester-friendly.

    Automaton is a test automation tool. Automaton uses a visual flowchart-based design interface. It enables end to end continuous test automation of all components in application development - Web, APIs, Logs and Database Processes/Operations.

    With no-code interface, users without any coding knowledge can run the application. It comes with a rich set of APIs that helps Automaton to integrate with popular CI tools like Jenkins.

    Available as a SaaS offering, for On-Premise deployments and in a hybrid model.

    Key Features

    1. Data-Driven Testing
    Upload bulk credentials through a single CSV file.

    2. Regression Testing
    Take a big leap from execution planning to the creation of regression plans.

    3. Reusability
    Access reusable test steps while executing the new test case.

    4. Collaboration
    Test cases and steps can be duplicated and shared with other users within the group.

    5. No-Code Testing
    Codeless testing automation is powered by flowchart-based UI.

    6. UX & Usability
    Configurable GUI and CLI enable users to handle most complex test cases easily.

    7. Easy to Use
    Intuitive UI and support documentation help the users to understand the tool quickly.

      Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

      SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

      Sample Customers
      Schneider Electric, Orange, O2, IBM, JPMorgan Chase
      Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
      Top Industries
      No Data Available
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm43%
      Government14%
      Manufacturing Company7%
      Energy/Utilities Company7%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm32%
      Manufacturing Company14%
      Computer Software Company13%
      Government5%
      Company Size
      No Data Available
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business22%
      Midsize Enterprise9%
      Large Enterprise69%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business16%
      Midsize Enterprise9%
      Large Enterprise75%
      Buyer's Guide
      Functional Testing Tools
      April 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
      767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Automaton is ranked 41st in Functional Testing Tools while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews. Automaton is rated 0.0, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Reliable with a good interface but uses too much memory". Automaton is most compared with Appvance IQ, whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Klocwork and Polyspace Code Prover.

      See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

      We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.