Automaton vs OpenText Silk Test comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Torry Harris Integration Solutions Logo
112 views|84 comparisons
OpenText Logo
1,719 views|1,168 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automaton and OpenText Silk Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Automaton?
SrinivasPakala
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."
  • "We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."
  • More OpenText Silk Test Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    41st
    Views
    112
    Comparisons
    84
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    25th
    Views
    1,719
    Comparisons
    1,168
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test
    Learn More
    Overview

    An illustrative test automation tool with a code-less approach towards end-to-end application testing. Visual flow-based approaches for test cases makes it tester-friendly.

    Automaton is a test automation tool. Automaton uses a visual flowchart-based design interface. It enables end to end continuous test automation of all components in application development - Web, APIs, Logs and Database Processes/Operations.

    With no-code interface, users without any coding knowledge can run the application. It comes with a rich set of APIs that helps Automaton to integrate with popular CI tools like Jenkins.

    Available as a SaaS offering, for On-Premise deployments and in a hybrid model.

    Key Features

    1. Data-Driven Testing
    Upload bulk credentials through a single CSV file.

    2. Regression Testing
    Take a big leap from execution planning to the creation of regression plans.

    3. Reusability
    Access reusable test steps while executing the new test case.

    4. Collaboration
    Test cases and steps can be duplicated and shared with other users within the group.

    5. No-Code Testing
    Codeless testing automation is powered by flowchart-based UI.

    6. UX & Usability
    Configurable GUI and CLI enable users to handle most complex test cases easily.

    7. Easy to Use
    Intuitive UI and support documentation help the users to understand the tool quickly.

      SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.
      Sample Customers
      Schneider Electric, Orange, O2, IBM, JPMorgan Chase
      Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, MÂȘller, AVG Technologies
      Top Industries
      No Data Available
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company21%
      Financial Services Firm14%
      Manufacturing Company8%
      Comms Service Provider6%
      Company Size
      No Data Available
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business20%
      Midsize Enterprise20%
      Large Enterprise60%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business19%
      Midsize Enterprise13%
      Large Enterprise69%
      Buyer's Guide
      Functional Testing Tools
      April 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
      768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Automaton is ranked 41st in Functional Testing Tools while OpenText Silk Test is ranked 25th in Functional Testing Tools. Automaton is rated 0.0, while OpenText Silk Test is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Silk Test writes "Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available". Automaton is most compared with Appvance IQ, whereas OpenText Silk Test is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, OpenText UFT Developer, Apache JMeter and froglogic Squish.

      See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

      We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.