Compare Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs. CA Release Automation

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is ranked 4th in Release Automation with 7 reviews while CA Release Automation is ranked 9th in Release Automation with 2 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is rated 8.0, while CA Release Automation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation writes "The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it, but everybody has to need to use this tool in the organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Release Automation writes "Improved our deployment speed, but it may no longer be part of CA's long-term strategy". Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is most compared with Ansible, CA Release Automation and Control-M, whereas CA Release Automation is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy, XebiaLabs XL Deploy and Automic Continuous Delivery Automation .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Microsoft, Chef and others in Release Automation. Updated: January 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done.It is an umbrella system that allows us to integrate many different systems into our heterogeneous environment.The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it.It can support very complex environments and dependencies.It gives us good feedback on visualizations and on how our processes have progressed.The most valuable feature is the ability to see which problems have been resolved from deployment.The product provides efficiency, in terms time, cost, and resources.It provides a wonderful user interface which is easy to use.

Read more »

The CA Application Insight feature is the solution's most valuable aspect.

Read more »

Cons
There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them.It would be very beneficial for us to see integrations into cloud environments, especially into the Google Cloud environment because we are heading towards cloud.There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system.If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details.At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2.We hope that we can integrate the new CD Directive into our portfolio, so we can bring the deployment and release management closer together.The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform.

Read more »

The configuration of the solution is a bit difficult to maneuver. They should work to make it easier.It could use better integration with development tools.A concern with CA Release Automation is that Automic was acquired by CA recently. We're a bit concerned that CA strategy is going with Automic, that CA Release Automation is dead. They are not investing in it too much... They do say, that in the next two or three years we don't need to worry. They will still provide support for CA Release Automation. But we're not sure how CA Release Automation will evolve.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool.I can save time and money more quickly.We increased our quality and reduced our time costs.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
out of 28 in Release Automation
Views
3,042
Comparisons
1,485
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
403
Avg. Rating
8.0
9th
out of 28 in Release Automation
Views
2,859
Comparisons
1,416
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
722
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform
Learn
Broadcom
Broadcom
Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar. 

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

CA Release Automation enables you to seamlessly connect the continuous delivery ecosystem to deliver high-quality applications faster than ever before. With this enterprise-ready solution, you can accelerate and stabilize application deployments from development to test to production. Its advanced capabilities can help you plan, manage and optimize the continuous delivery pipeline to improve release quality and efficiency. With CA Release Automation, get automated, agile release management that’s ready to work in your IT world.

Offer
Learn more about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation
Learn more about CA Release Automation
Sample Customers
BET365, Charter Communications, TASCCA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco. Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm50%
Retailer25%
Transportation Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Marketing Services Firm28%
Software R&D Company15%
Comms Service Provider13%
Transportation Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm37%
Comms Service Provider19%
Insurance Company15%
Hospitality Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company24%
Financial Services Firm22%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government12%
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Microsoft, Chef and others in Release Automation. Updated: January 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.