Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs Nolio Release Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation and Nolio Release Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The main benefit is you can deploy everything with it.""It can support very complex environments and dependencies.""I think on a day-to-day basis, it has increased the capacity to deploy. We don't have to wait for someone to do something.""It gives us good feedback on visualizations and on how our processes have progressed.""The metrics gathered after deployment, for example, the rate of success versus the rate of failure.""The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done.""Self-service for developers, because they are able to deploy to development departments on their own, without needing people from operations.""It provides a wonderful user interface which is easy to use."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pros →

"One standout aspect is its architecture. We can configure multiple instances on a single server using different system names or usernames.""The CA Application Insight feature is the solution's most valuable aspect.""The graphical view of when you're writing flow is the most valuable feature."

More Nolio Release Automation Pros →

Cons
"If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details.""I would like to see more support for WebSphere.""At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2.""It would be very beneficial for us to see integrations into cloud environments, especially into the Google Cloud environment because we are heading towards cloud.""key thing is support for cloud-based deployment. That is lacking.""We hope that we can integrate the new CD Directive into our portfolio, so we can bring the deployment and release management closer together.""The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform.""One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform. There is a little bit of a learning curve in learning how to code some of the workflows in Automic at this time. If widely used languages like Perl and Python were integrated, on top of what's already there, the proprietary language, it would make it easier to on-board new resources."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Cons →

"In the next release, I would like to see more features to use active directory. And more rules to support more Python scripts and to work with Kubernetes and clouds, to have an easy solution for a lot of parameters.""A concern with CA Release Automation is that Automic was acquired by CA recently. We're a bit concerned that CA strategy is going with Automic, that CA Release Automation is dead. They are not investing in it too much... They do say, that in the next two or three years we don't need to worry. They will still provide support for CA Release Automation. But we're not sure how CA Release Automation will evolve.""The configuration of the solution is a bit difficult to maneuver. They should work to make it easier.""It could use better integration with development tools.""When I started using Nolio around eight months ago, a challenge was the lack of relevant information and related support for learning."

More Nolio Release Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."
  • "I can save time and money more quickly."
  • "If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."
  • "Customers often complain about the price."
  • More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools."
  • More Nolio Release Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:One standout aspect is its architecture. We can configure multiple instances on a single server using different system names or usernames.
    Top Answer:Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools. The pricing could be cheaper. In our organization, we've been using it for… more »
    Top Answer:When I started using Nolio around eight months ago, a challenge was the lack of relevant information and related support for learning. There's also not many instructional materials and videos on… more »
    Ranking
    17th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    367
    Comparisons
    299
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    13th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    696
    Comparisons
    389
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    765
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform
    CA Release Automation
    Learn More
    Overview

    Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar. 

    Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

    CA Release Automation enables you to seamlessly connect the continuous delivery ecosystem to deliver high-quality applications faster than ever before. With this enterprise-ready solution, you can accelerate and stabilize application deployments from development to test to production. Its advanced capabilities can help you plan, manage and optimize the continuous delivery pipeline to improve release quality and efficiency. With CA Release Automation, get automated, agile release management that’s ready to work in your IT world.

    Sample Customers
    BET365, Charter Communications, TASC
    CA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco. Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm36%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Transportation Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm41%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Insurance Company14%
    Hospitality Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm56%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company4%
    Hospitality Company4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise80%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise88%
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is ranked 17th in Release Automation while Nolio Release Automation is ranked 13th in Release Automation with 50 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is rated 8.0, while Nolio Release Automation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation writes "Reduces our time to market considerably with automated and consistent results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nolio Release Automation writes " Enables one-touch application deployment across various environments". Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Nolio Release Automation is most compared with GitLab, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Chef.

    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.