Compare Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs. UrbanCode Deploy

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs. UrbanCode Deploy and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution.""The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pros »

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes.""The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts.""The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

More UrbanCode Deploy Pros »

Cons
"Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement.""There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Cons »

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do.""I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline.""I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

More UrbanCode Deploy Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have.""Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

More UrbanCode Deploy Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution.
Top Answer: Our primary use case is for the deployment of web service applications.
Top Answer: I would rate it a seven out of ten. Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement. My advice to someone considering this solution is to be very flexible with this… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts.
Top Answer: The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have. There is a separate charge if you want support from IBM, and the… more »
Top Answer: This solution could be made more flexible with respect to deploying databases. Liquibase is a valuable feature but it is weak and could be better. I have just seen a video on a product called Datical… more »
Ranking
10th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
1,612
Comparisons
791
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
392
Rating
7.5
4th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
7,636
Comparisons
5,419
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
835
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation PlatformuDeploy
Learn
Broadcom
IBM
Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar. 

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

Offer
Learn more about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation
Learn more about UrbanCode Deploy
Sample Customers
BET365, Charter Communications, TASCAs policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites.  However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm50%
Retailer25%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Transportation Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Financial Services Firm12%
Comms Service Provider9%
Media Company8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Insurance Company22%
Healthcare Company17%
Retailer11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise83%
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise64%
Find out what your peers are saying about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs. UrbanCode Deploy and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is ranked 10th in Release Automation with 2 reviews while UrbanCode Deploy is ranked 4th in Release Automation with 3 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is rated 7.6, while UrbanCode Deploy is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation writes "Good interface, excellent event monitoring, and capability to scale". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UrbanCode Deploy writes "Provides a Full Overview of the Development Environment". Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is most compared with Ansible, AutoSys Workload Automation, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Nolio Release Automation and Control-M, whereas UrbanCode Deploy is most compared with Ansible, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Digital.ai Deploy, Nolio Release Automation and GoCD. See our Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs. UrbanCode Deploy report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.