• Home
  • Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs. BMC Release Lifecycle Management

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs BMC Release Lifecycle Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z and BMC Release Lifecycle Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
32nd
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
22
Comparisons
12
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
18th
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
274
Comparisons
190
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Varalogix, BMC RLM
Learn More
Broadcom
Video Not Available
BMC
Overview

Modernize your legacy systems.
We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

Software release management doesn’t have to be difficult when you choose the right release management tools. As the volume, frequency, and complexity of your applications grow, so does the risk with each application release. With BMC Release Lifecycle Management you can mitigate risk and meet demand by enabling your DevOps team to automate and coordinate application release processes across the development and deployment lifecycle.

  • Deploy app changes faster with greater visibility and streamlined processes.
  • Lower costs by reducing downtime and increasing productivity.
  • Reduce errors with customized templates, improved collaboration, and automated deployment.
  • Remediate failed release steps during the application release automation process.
Sample Customers
eviivo
BMC Software, Sanofi, Societe Generale Group
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 32nd in Release Automation while BMC Release Lifecycle Management is ranked 18th in Release Automation. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while BMC Release Lifecycle Management is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas BMC Release Lifecycle Management is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.