Compare Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs. BMC Release Lifecycle Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
30th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
16
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
17th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
480
Comparisons
392
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Varalogix, BMC RLM
Learn More
Overview

Modernize your legacy systems.
We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

Software release management doesn’t have to be difficult when you choose the right release management tools. As the volume, frequency, and complexity of your applications grow, so does the risk with each application release. With BMC Release Lifecycle Management you can mitigate risk and meet demand by enabling your DevOps team to automate and coordinate application release processes across the development and deployment lifecycle.

  • Deploy app changes faster with greater visibility and streamlined processes.
  • Lower costs by reducing downtime and increasing productivity.
  • Reduce errors with customized templates, improved collaboration, and automated deployment.
  • Remediate failed release steps during the application release automation process.
Offer
Learn more about Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z
Learn more about BMC Release Lifecycle Management
Sample Customers
eviivo
BMC Software, Sanofi, Societe Generale Group
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm48%
Computer Software Company20%
Comms Service Provider16%
Local Government4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 30th in Release Automation while BMC Release Lifecycle Management is ranked 17th in Release Automation. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while BMC Release Lifecycle Management is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas BMC Release Lifecycle Management is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy, Ansible and Microsoft Azure DevOps.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.