Compare Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs. Clarive

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
30th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
16
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
19th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
269
Comparisons
216
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2021.
476,163 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Modernize your legacy systems.
We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

Clarive Software provides a DevOps platform for the evolving enterprise on every platform. Founded in 2010, the company is headquartered in Spain and today has offices in the US, Brazil, UK, and Belgium. Its senior management team has close to 20 years of practical experience in ALM, release and deployment management. Clarive is currently building up a strong partner channel to rapidly expand its success globally.

Clarive‘s solution is highly valued by several Fortune 100 global enterprises with critical and complex systems in the financial and telecom industry such as BNP Paribasand Telefónica, thanks to its configuration elasticity to adapt to complex processes and its high scalability. The success of Clarive also includes other worldwide clients such as Capgemini, Banc Sabadell, Banco Popular, Jazztel/Orange, RSI, and the Spanish Central Bank.


Offer
Learn more about Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z
Learn more about Clarive
Sample Customers
eviivo
Banc Sabadell, Jazztel, VASS Group, TUI, Telefonica
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2021.
476,163 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 30th in Release Automation while Clarive is ranked 19th in Release Automation. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while Clarive is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas Clarive is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps and Qentelli.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.