We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs. GitLab

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Use Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z? Share your opinion.
Gizem Mercan
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: October 2021.
540,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.""The price is okay.""It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses.""Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version.""It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."

More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
540,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions.
Top Answer: It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the… more »
Top Answer: We would like to generate document pages from the sources. Right now, we can't do that. The testing could be better in that, for the code quality, now we use an external product and maybe the internal… more »
Ranking
30th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
22
Comparisons
15
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
3rd
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
10,840
Comparisons
9,668
Reviews
15
Average Words per Review
389
Rating
8.2
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Modernize your legacy systems.
We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

GitLab is a single application with features for the whole software development and operations (DevOps) lifecycle.

Offer
Learn more about Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z
Learn more about GitLab
Sample Customers
eviivo
Siemens, University of Washington, Equinix, Paessler AG, CNCF, Ticketmaster, CERN, Vaadin
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Mining And Metals Company18%
Computer Software Company18%
Transportation Company9%
Financial Services Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider22%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business53%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise35%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: October 2021.
540,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 30th in Release Automation while GitLab is ranked 3rd in Release Automation with 15 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while GitLab is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitLab writes "Provides or mandates quantitative code into the Master". Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Tekton, TeamCity, Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and GoCD.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.