Compare Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs. HCL Launch

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
30th
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
16
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
23rd
out of 31 in Release Automation
Views
84
Comparisons
63
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
HCL UrbanCode Deploy
Learn More
Overview

Modernize your legacy systems.
We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

Deploy anything, anywhere with our market-leading continuous delivery solution. HCL Launch is engineered to handle your most complex deployment situations with push-button automation and controlled auditing needed in production.

Offer
Learn more about Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z
Learn more about HCL Launch
Sample Customers
eviivo
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2021.
475,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 30th in Release Automation while HCL Launch is ranked 23rd in Release Automation. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while HCL Launch is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas HCL Launch is most compared with UrbanCode Deploy and Ansible.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.