Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs Octopus Deploy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Octopus Deploy Logo
1,706 views|1,214 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z and Octopus Deploy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z?
AbhishekSingh11
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I don't know the exact cost, but it's not exorbitant. It may be a couple of thousand dollars a year or something like that. I'm not sure, but it's reasonable. We get value for money out of it."
  • More Octopus Deploy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Deployment is valuable. It deploys well.
    Top Answer:You've got to jump through a few hoops to get some things configured, but if set up, you can do so many different things in it. So, there is complexity.
    Top Answer:We're a DevOps team., and its use case is deployment. That's the only thing it does. Our version is relatively recent.
    Ranking
    32nd
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    22
    Comparisons
    12
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    8th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    1,706
    Comparisons
    1,214
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Modernize your legacy systems.
    We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

    At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

    At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

    Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
    Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
    Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
    Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
    Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
    Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

    Octopus Deploy is the most popular deployment automation tool in the world. Our software is used by teams to deploy .NET, Java, Node, and database applications, to hundreds and thousands of servers in the cloud and on-premises.

    Sample Customers
    eviivo
    Microsoft, NASA, Cisco, Domain, HP, Symantec, 3M, Philips
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization33%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 32nd in Release Automation while Octopus Deploy is ranked 8th in Release Automation with 3 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while Octopus Deploy is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Octopus Deploy writes "Easy to set up with intuitive UI and good reliability". Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas Octopus Deploy is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, UrbanCode Deploy, GitLab and AWS CodeDeploy.

    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.