We performed a comparison between CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] and Comindware Tracker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."The product is stable. This is the reason that we are using Automic, in some cases, because of its stability and features."
"If I have a higher workload with smaller machines, it is easy to increase everything."
"It provides a simple reduction of headcount and also a reduction of run through time."
"Jobs are planned automatically to eliminate the need to plan them manually. It also saves us effort because there is no need to create job objects manually."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"It is perhaps the most user-friendly web forms automation software. At least, I did not find anything better while testing several others similar to it."
"It successfully routes hand-offs between different teams, adds transparency to workflows, and has a set of social collaboration tools."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"What I am missing today is robotics. If Automic would like to stay as one of the biggest automation engines on the market, they have to find an option with a robotics solution."
"In the last two years or so, Automic has not invested as much in the product as we would have expected."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation while Comindware Tracker is ranked 32nd in Process Automation. CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is rated 10.0, while Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] writes "Automation of job object creation increased the quality and quantity of our job requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Comindware Tracker is most compared with .
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
