CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] vs OpenText MBPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product is stable. This is the reason that we are using Automic, in some cases, because of its stability and features.""If I have a higher workload with smaller machines, it is easy to increase everything.""It provides a simple reduction of headcount and also a reduction of run through time.""Jobs are planned automatically to eliminate the need to plan them manually. It also saves us effort because there is no need to create job objects manually."

More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Pros →

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

More OpenText MBPM Pros →

Cons
"In the last two years or so, Automic has not invested as much in the product as we would have expected.""What I am missing today is robotics. If Automic would like to stay as one of the biggest automation engines on the market, they have to find an option with a robotics solution."

More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Cons →

"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part.""The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

More OpenText MBPM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "From our clients, "We have reduced headcounts since the beginning by around 30 to 40 percent." and "We are much faster using the service orchestration and saving by a factor of 10 or more.""
  • More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."
  • More OpenText MBPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution.
    Top Answer:There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part. However, support is a major area that needs improvement. In general, the technical documentation isn't available to start with… more »
    Top Answer:We use OpenText MBPM for business process management and vendor invoice management. There are a lot of other variations as well. So we don't just use it for automation. Primarily, we get information… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Process Automation
    Views
    446
    Comparisons
    265
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Metastorm BPM
    Learn More
    Overview

    Service orchestration enables organizations to extract the most value from their investments in people and technology. Because time spent waiting for a service request means wasted money and lost opportunity.

    Service orchestration can intelligently automate the sometimes complex sequence of tasks required to deliver a service. Whether those tasks need to be executed on-premises or in the cloud, on virtual or physical systems, or even using leading-edge technologies like microservices or containers, service orchestration ensures that those tasks are executed accurately and efficiently. This maximizes productivity and enables businesses to move at digital speeds.


    OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company11%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Process Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is rated 10.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] writes "Automation of job object creation increased the quality and quantity of our job requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian and Pega BPM.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.