CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] vs WorkflowGen comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It provides a simple reduction of headcount and also a reduction of run through time.""The product is stable. This is the reason that we are using Automic, in some cases, because of its stability and features.""If I have a higher workload with smaller machines, it is easy to increase everything.""Jobs are planned automatically to eliminate the need to plan them manually. It also saves us effort because there is no need to create job objects manually."

More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Pros →

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

More WorkflowGen Pros →

Cons
"In the last two years or so, Automic has not invested as much in the product as we would have expected.""What I am missing today is robotics. If Automic would like to stay as one of the biggest automation engines on the market, they have to find an option with a robotics solution."

More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Cons →

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

More WorkflowGen Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "From our clients, "We have reduced headcounts since the beginning by around 30 to 40 percent." and "We are much faster using the service orchestration and saving by a factor of 10 or more.""
  • More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Process Automation
    34th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    99
    Comparisons
    80
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Process Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Service orchestration enables organizations to extract the most value from their investments in people and technology. Because time spent waiting for a service request means wasted money and lost opportunity.

    Service orchestration can intelligently automate the sometimes complex sequence of tasks required to deliver a service. Whether those tasks need to be executed on-premises or in the cloud, on virtual or physical systems, or even using leading-edge technologies like microservices or containers, service orchestration ensures that those tasks are executed accurately and efficiently. This maximizes productivity and enables businesses to move at digital speeds.


    Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

    Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

    Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

    Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

    Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.
    Buyer's Guide
    Process Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation while WorkflowGen is ranked 34th in Process Automation. CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is rated 10.0, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] writes "Automation of job object creation increased the quality and quantity of our job requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is most compared with , whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with .

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.