AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Workload Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
4,608 views|2,402 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
9,505 views|7,115 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 11, 2023

We performed a comparison between Automic Workload Automation and AutoSys Workload Automation based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

Features: Automic Workload Automation is highly praised for its robustness, scalability, and implementation simplicity. It provides control over various operating systems and products. AutoSys Workload Automation is valued for its scalability, user-friendly interface, and quick execution.

Automic Workload Automation needs industry-standardization and plug-and-play automation processes, improved language support, better functionality, a user-friendly interface, an enhanced web-based edition, and more competitive pricing. AutoSys Workload Automation users want integration with cloud services, easier reporting and comparison of job performance, better Linux environment integration, improved file transfer job handling, advanced features and functionalities, and the ability to monitor and manage workload windows.

Service and Support: Automic Workload Automation's customer service has received both positive and negative feedback. Some customers appreciate the prompt response and informative knowledge articles, while others have faced challenges in contacting the support team. AutoSys Workload Automation's customer service is highly acclaimed, with users describing it as excellent, helpful, and responsive. The support team is perceived as competent and equipped.

Ease of Deployment: Automic Workload Automation's setup duration varies from one to five days. AutoSys Workload Automation boasts a quick and uncomplicated setup process, requiring only 10 minutes or less. The simplicity of the setup may be influenced by the user's familiarity and needs.

Pricing: Automic Workload Automation offers pricing based on the number of systems being orchestrated, which is considered expensive yet still affordable compared to similar solutions. AutoSys Workload Automation involves a yearly subscription and an annual license, with costs for agents and server setup that can vary.

ROI: There is a lack of ROI information for Automic Workload Automation. AutoSys offers various advantages including heightened productivity, enhanced efficiency, cost savings, improved visibility and control, and decreased downtime. However, the actual ROI may differ depending on factors like company size and workload complexity.

Comparison Results: Automic Workload Automation is highly recommended due to its impressive strength, scalability, and effortless implementation. Users appreciate its extensive range of features and intuitive interface. Automic's versatility in managing various operating systems and products is particularly valuable for environments that contain a blend of outdated and modern technologies.

To learn more, read our detailed AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We do not have to use a broad variety of agents to connect to different types of systems.""Support is good and it works fine.""The most valuable features are that a lot systems are supported. You can use this for z/OS, Windows, Unix, SAP, etc.""It is 100% stable. We have no downtime. We have 24/7 production throughout the year.""The functionality is great, the scripting language is very powerful. They can adapt to most use cases. Very good community of different companies and a user base so when we have problems we can go to other people.""It has its own object-oriented scripting language and you can reload your object in many different places.""The ability to be able to automate more of our business processes.""Workload Automation's most valuable features are perspective analytics and coding."

More Automic Workload Automation Pros →

"The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs.""The aggregator reporting utility which tells us our throughput in lag and latency.""It is very valuable for us when we are trying to arrange or orchestrate jobs into a system. It is helpful for triggering jobs for a scheduled task.""The features that I have found most valuable with AutoSys are that it is scalable, easy to use, fast, and always available. That's very important because if it's not steady then it's a real problem. So, at this point, we are satisfied with it.""The scheduling feature allows us to know when jobs are going to run and makes sure they run in the order needed.""We get better reports than we use to have.""Automic Automation Engine provides us the ability to map logic using a scripting language.""CA Workload Automation AutoSys Edition is one of the most powerful schedulers that you have on the open systems, or going between Window servers; to be able to schedule and take advantage of the different powers that the automation has with it."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Pros →

Cons
"ServiceNow creates problems with the Automic entry of the connector, so the stability could be a little bit better with this product.""When there's an error or a problem, the automation part of it could be easily programmed to escalate it up to the developers or whoever is going to work on it. We had to home-grow that within the product because third-party products are so expensive.""From my point of view, the current product needs more stability.""The forecast and long-term planning could be made a little better when you work with it in the future.""I would like a good AWI in the next release. The AWI is not fully functional at this time.""We would like to have some features with the AWI with the founding technique, which cannot currently be delivered.""This solution's out-of-box automation sets could be improved. They could be industry standardized out-of-box, or even runbook automation processes could be useful—just some plug-and-play automation processes out-of-box. It has many integration capabilities, from APIs to databases, but if the customer sees some out-of-box automation processes in it, it could be useful.""Some of the things we don't do are mainly because we don't know how to do them. Hands-on training can be expensive, so we find other ways to work around things to forgo the hands-on training. It is also an issue because we are a Linux shop and most trainers are Windows-based."

More Automic Workload Automation Cons →

"​The cross-platform arena, where you can run work on multiple platforms, needs improvement.""The reporting system, currently, could be better.""The lack of documentation, that is an issue. When we do need to bring it down for maintenance, it is always a scary moment for us because we have never had it crash.""SQL server clustering is not supported.""Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier.""I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us.""The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars.""Ease of implementation for upgrades."

More AutoSys Workload Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Automatic is heavily integrated in our organization. The cost to change would be a huge factor for us, and we have not found any other product that is better out there."
  • "Do your own proof of concept. Make sure you know what you want. Be clear about what you want the product to do for you. Go out and meet with the vendor, then test it."
  • "The cost of arrays is high. If you want to buy an array for an application, and see value from it, you need about half a million dollars. That is too expensive."
  • "It costs to scale. While, it is scalable, the add-ons are expensive."
  • "It has helped us reduce costs."
  • "You do not need any humans to start jobs, so you can save a lot of money."
  • "We have received a lot of time and cost efficiencies from using the product."
  • "We cannot use all the functions because they are too expensive."
  • More Automic Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Validate how many agents you need beforehand."
  • "CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."
  • "People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."
  • "I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."
  • "It is overpriced."
  • "The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."
  • "There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."
  • More AutoSys Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is easy to manage complex workloads and use electronic workflow automation.
    Top Answer:The solution was flexible in terms of pricing. We're moving away from it, not due to price, but rather based on our requirements. They did provide us with an unlimited license that matched our budget.
    Top Answer:The AI capabilities and predictive modeling aren't very good. I don't see a future for that. It's very basic. That's part of the reason we moved to Stonebranch. They have more analytic capabilities… more »
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 51 in Workload Automation
    Views
    4,608
    Comparisons
    2,402
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    661
    Rating
    8.3
    6th
    out of 51 in Workload Automation
    Views
    9,505
    Comparisons
    7,115
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    468
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Automic Dollar Universe
    CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE
    Learn More
    Overview

    Broadcom's Automic Workload Automation (AWA) stands out as a robust and advanced solution in the field of workload automation and orchestration. Designed for complex enterprise environments, it enables organizations to automate, manage, and optimize their IT workflows and business processes. This solution is particularly beneficial for IT professionals and business executives seeking to enhance operational efficiency, reduce manual workload, and drive digital transformation.

    Automic Workload Automation offers a unified platform for managing diverse tasks across various environments and applications. This centralization simplifies the orchestration of workflows, enhancing visibility and control. IT professionals appreciate this feature as it allows for streamlined management and more efficient resource utilization. AWA's architecture is designed to scale with the growing demands of businesses. It supports a broad range of applications and platforms, making it a versatile tool for different IT environments.

    AWA's analytics and reporting capabilities provide deep insights into workflow performance and potential bottlenecks. This aspect is particularly valuable for data-driven decision-making, helping organizations to optimize processes and improve overall efficiency. The ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide array of applications, databases, and systems, facilitates smooth and automated workflows across various IT landscapes, crucial for enterprises that utilize a mix of legacy and modern applications.

    Automic Workload Automation users on PeerSpot.com have highlighted several strengths; IT professionals frequently commend its robust scheduling capabilities, noting that it handles complex dependencies and scenarios with ease. The intuitive user interface is also frequently mentioned, simplifying the task of managing and monitoring automated workflows. Business executives, on the other hand, appreciate the solution's contribution to strategic business initiatives, such as digital transformation and cloud migration, due to its advanced automation capabilities.

      AutoSys Workload Automation delivers end-to-end visibility of application workloads and dependencies across platforms, ERP systems, and the cloud. Thanks to event-based triggering, real-time alerting, and dynamic critical path management, business applications are ensured for availability.

      By intelligently and effectively assigning workloads based on real-time information about the available computing resources and service level agreements, AutoSys Workload Automation scales to enterprise demands with ease. The solution permits businesses to swiftly provision and handle workloads in physical, virtualized, and cloud environments.

      The platform helps to reduce the cost and complexity of managing mission-critical business processes, ensuring consistent and reliable service delivery. AutoSys Workload Automation is a job control solution that allows you to manage workloads via a command-line interface (CLI) or graphical user interface (GUI).

      AutoSys Workload Automation Features

      AutoSys Workload Automation has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

      • Multi-platform scheduling: Manage and visualize a process end to end across multiple platforms from a central point of control.
      • Extensive scalability: Provide production scalability without the need for multiple server instances.
      • Extensive app support: Manage workloads for business apps such as PeopleSoft, SAP, and Oracle E-Business. This results in lower operating costs and increased cross-enterprise visibility.
      • Built-in fault tolerance: Robust, lights-out operations with automated recovery that facilitates the availability of business systems by enabling jobs to be completed accurately and on time.
      • Self service: End-users have the ability to request and execute workload processing that is controlled by workload policy and governance processes. This gives businesses more control over their own services.
      • Security and compliance: Better meet regulatory compliance requirements by defining access permissions at any level. If there are problems, you can view what was changed, by whom, and at what time.

      AutoSys Workload Automation Benefits

      There are many benefits to implementing AutoSys Workload Automation. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

      • Job scheduling, monitoring, and reporting: Jobs can be scheduled across platforms. When a job enters different production schedule phases, keep track of it and give reports.
      • Create reports that ease regulatory compliance and improve control.
      • Forecasting is used to detect and comprehend the business impact of work within a job stream. You can send notifications for overdue tasks or bypass less critical jobs.
      • Managing resources: The solution assesses the resources that are available and schedules jobs to achieve a defined SLA, enhancing resource utilization.

      Reviews from Real Users

      AutoSys Workload Automation stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its file transfer protocol and its visibility for batch processing. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

      One PeerSpot reviewer, an IT consultant at a computer software company, writes, “The most valuable features of AutoSys Workload Automation are the file transfer protocol and file watcher. The solution has a user-friendly user interface. It is very simple to use. You have a scope of all your jobs, jobs are what you call tasks that you will automate in the solution. It lets you monitor everything in these jobs.

      Another PeerSpot reviewer, a head at an insurance company, notes, “It gives a real-time view of all the batch processing that we have. Monitoring-wise, it is really good. It also gives us the ability to connect different software processes.”

      Sample Customers
      ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB
      Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm29%
      Manufacturing Company13%
      Retailer11%
      Insurance Company11%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm21%
      Computer Software Company11%
      Manufacturing Company10%
      Insurance Company7%
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm46%
      Insurance Company14%
      Energy/Utilities Company11%
      Healthcare Company6%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm46%
      Manufacturing Company12%
      Computer Software Company7%
      Insurance Company5%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business17%
      Midsize Enterprise17%
      Large Enterprise67%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business14%
      Midsize Enterprise11%
      Large Enterprise75%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business12%
      Midsize Enterprise6%
      Large Enterprise82%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business9%
      Midsize Enterprise6%
      Large Enterprise85%
      Buyer's Guide
      AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Workload Automation
      March 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Workload Automation and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
      767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Automic Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 85 reviews while AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews. Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2, while AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "A tool requiring an easy setup phase that provides its users with flexibility and flow chart visibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Dollar Universe Workload Automation, AppWorx Workload Automation and IBM Workload Automation, whereas AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence. See our AutoSys Workload Automation vs. Automic Workload Automation report.

      See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

      We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.