• Home
  • Automic Workload Automation vs. IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager

Automic Workload Automation vs IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Workload Automation
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Workload Automation and IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Bernd Stroehle.
Offers excellent functionality, reduces job and workload failure, and enhances our compliance processes
Overall, Automic Workload Automation offers excellent functionality and is an outstanding product in the market. Despite its limitations, it... Read more →
Use IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Automatic is heavily integrated in our organization. The cost to change would be a huge factor for us, and we have not found any other product that is better out there."
  • "Do your own proof of concept. Make sure you know what you want. Be clear about what you want the product to do for you. Go out and meet with the vendor, then test it."
  • "The cost of arrays is high. If you want to buy an array for an application, and see value from it, you need about half a million dollars. That is too expensive."
  • "It costs to scale. While, it is scalable, the add-ons are expensive."
  • "It has helped us reduce costs."
  • "You do not need any humans to start jobs, so you can save a lot of money."
  • "We have received a lot of time and cost efficiencies from using the product."
  • "We cannot use all the functions because they are too expensive."

    • More Automic Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Automic Workload Automation?
    Top Answer:It is easy to manage complex workloads and use electronic workflow automation.
    Read all 64 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automic Workload ...
    Top Answer:The solution was flexible in terms of pricing. We're moving away from it, not due to price, but rather based on our requirements. They did provide us with an unlimited license that matched our budget.
    Read all 23 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Automic Workload Automation?
    Top Answer:The AI capabilities and predictive modeling aren't very good. I don't see a future for that. It's very basic. That's part of the reason we moved to Stonebranch. They have more analytic capabilities… more »
    Read all 64 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    7th
    out of 51 in Workload Automation
    Views
    4,608
    Comparisons
    2,402
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    661
    Rating
    8.3
    7th
    out of 7 in Cluster Provisioning
    Views
    4
    Comparisons
    4
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Automic Dollar Universe
    Tivoli Provisioning Manager
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    IBM
    Overview

    Broadcom's Automic Workload Automation (AWA) stands out as a robust and advanced solution in the field of workload automation and orchestration. Designed for complex enterprise environments, it enables organizations to automate, manage, and optimize their IT workflows and business processes. This solution is particularly beneficial for IT professionals and business executives seeking to enhance operational efficiency, reduce manual workload, and drive digital transformation.

    Automic Workload Automation offers a unified platform for managing diverse tasks across various environments and applications. This centralization simplifies the orchestration of workflows, enhancing visibility and control. IT professionals appreciate this feature as it allows for streamlined management and more efficient resource utilization. AWA's architecture is designed to scale with the growing demands of businesses. It supports a broad range of applications and platforms, making it a versatile tool for different IT environments.

    AWA's analytics and reporting capabilities provide deep insights into workflow performance and potential bottlenecks. This aspect is particularly valuable for data-driven decision-making, helping organizations to optimize processes and improve overall efficiency. The ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide array of applications, databases, and systems, facilitates smooth and automated workflows across various IT landscapes, crucial for enterprises that utilize a mix of legacy and modern applications.

    Automic Workload Automation users on PeerSpot.com have highlighted several strengths; IT professionals frequently commend its robust scheduling capabilities, noting that it handles complex dependencies and scenarios with ease. The intuitive user interface is also frequently mentioned, simplifying the task of managing and monitoring automated workflows. Business executives, on the other hand, appreciate the solution's contribution to strategic business initiatives, such as digital transformation and cloud migration, due to its advanced automation capabilities.

      Tivoli Provisioning Manager helps organizations optimize efficiency, accuracy and service delivery by automating best practices for data center provisioning activities.
      Sample Customers
      ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB
      KPJ Healthcare Berhad, Keyword, Tennis Australia, Cxense ASA, SKIData AG, Unisys, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, RAVInvest, Odin, Chapman University, CloudHesive, Cima Solutions Group, Projetech, Grow Strategy
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm29%
      Manufacturing Company13%
      Retailer11%
      Insurance Company11%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm22%
      Computer Software Company11%
      Manufacturing Company10%
      Retailer6%
      No Data Available
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business17%
      Midsize Enterprise17%
      Large Enterprise67%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business14%
      Midsize Enterprise11%
      Large Enterprise75%
      No Data Available
      Buyer's Guide
      Workload Automation
      March 2024
      Download Free Report
      Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: March 2024.
      DOWNLOAD NOW
      767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Automic Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 85 reviews while IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is ranked 7th in Cluster Provisioning. Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2, while IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "A tool requiring an easy setup phase that provides its users with flexibility and flow chart visibility ". On the other hand, Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Dollar Universe Workload Automation and AppWorx Workload Automation, whereas IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager is most compared with Control-M and AutoSys Workload Automation.

      We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.