We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Automox vs. Quest KACE Systems Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Quest KACE Systems Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The fact that it's just one product that can patch multiple operating systems is really great.""They've been adding some new features lately, which I'm not nearly as familiar with, but the ability to just deploy patches and exempt certain machines from certain patches is helpful. For instance, for our servers, we may not want to roll out zero-day patches. We are able to exempt those and make sure that they don't get those policies. We've got certain servers that have to run a particular version of Java, and being able to exempt those servers from receiving Java updates is pretty fantastic.""Among the most valuable features are its ease of use and the Worklets. Both of them are time-savers. Worklets enable us to customize things for a given environment. It's something like when Apple lets other people create applications. Other peoples' Worklets can be used in our environment and in our customers' environments. That saves a lot of time, and it's really cool.""It's super easy to use and we haven't found anything easier.""The biggest improvement to our organization involves the reduction in its man hours... We've probably saved hundreds of hours.""Coming from prior solutions that were a lot more effort, Automox's patch management abilities are transformational. When I took over patching at my company, they were using on-premise architecture to patch. As the workforce shifted from being in the office into their home offices, I was able to lift and shift with no effort other than deploying the new agent out into the environment.""Its flexibility is most valuable.""The flexibility in creating tools to make changes on remote machines is most valuable to me. The reporting feature is also fantastic because on any given day I can bring up a list of machines that don't have patches, for example. Or I can bring up a list of machines that are in my environment on a certain day. The solution helps me with not only my own role, and what I look for internally myself, but it also helps during audits. I can go in and look at the number of machines in there, and their owners and timelines. It certainly helps tell a story for anything that IT requires."

More Automox Pros »

"The scripting is a very valuable feature, as it saves us time on pushing certain things out to the users, such as software and patches.""I can reach people now that I couldn't have reached previously. We are saving about 25 percent in time.""Pretty much all of the features are valuable. The inventory is very helpful to be able to keep track of our devices. The deployments make it easy to deploy new software packages or upgrade packages. The help desk is also a great tool for tracking problems and problem tickets.""The Systems Deployment Appliance is magical when it comes to automating deployment... Not only can we have multiple images, specific to end-users' uses, but we have a plethora of post-installation tasks to install or configure the system, tasks that can be re-used for each system. You just have one basic base image, and then you use the post-install tasks to customize everything else. It is amazing.""Using this solution saves us lots of time, especially when it comes to performing updates.""We have our KACE agent deployed on all of our workstations and servers, and it provides us with reports on the hardware and software inventory for those.""The software asset management has been a big help, even when it comes to license true-ups. I can use it to find out how many Tivoli we have, and boom, there's the number... And you can actually click on the information about the software and it shows, for example, that these five servers are where it's being reported. If you really want, you can log in to them and validate.""We use the Systems Deployment appliance. It's our bread and butter. It is every machine that gets imaged here in this building and out through the whole state goes through the SDA. We rely on it completely. There is no manual process of getting a laptop out of a box, plugging it up, turning it on, and waiting for Windows to start. If you were to go to Best Buy and buy a brand new laptop, you spend the next two to three hours just setting it up. We don't do that. We get a laptop, plug it into the network, connect it to the SDA, and within about three clicks, we're done."

More Quest KACE Systems Management Pros »

Cons
"As concerns the patching concepts, there's a bit of a learning curve in terms of working out how Automox wants you to work within the console, not only splitting up everything into groups, but then having the various policies assigned.""Asset management would be a great feature to add to Automox. We would run easier scripts or more out of the box scripts that would help us in audits. \""The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository. Currently, all updates are provided directly from the internet. So, if you have 1,000 devices, all 1,000 devices go directly out to the internet. We would love the option of being able to put the updates on local storage so that we're not consuming as much bandwidth. That is literally the only thing that we've ever wanted.""The biggest area they need to fix, without a doubt, is the ability to copy and sync profiles and worklets between all of the organizations you manage, and the ability to have top-level user access control across all of the companies that you manage.""We would like to see additional detailed reporting for Service providers like us. We had to build our own reports via their APIs to meet our needs.""There should be better inventory capabilities. Right now, they only allow you to have insight into software out-of-the-box. It would be nice to also extend that into custom inventory that can be modified and managed by the practitioner.""When we bring on a new client, we need to go into that client and manually set up my account, my chief engineer's account, three technicians' accounts, and a billing person's account all over again, which is annoying. We have probably up to 15 or 16 of our clients on Automox now. For every single one of those, we have had to go in and set this up. Then, if anything changes, we have to remember to go to Automox and change it 15 or 16 times. So, we just want inheritable permissions, and that is it. We have talked to them about this, and they are like, "Yeah, we hear a lot of complaints about it." I am thinking, "Guys, I have been complaining about this for a year and a half. When are you going to do it?" It must be some tricky thing or not an easy fix, because I can only assume if it were easy, then they would have done it by now.""The stability has come a long way from what it was like when it started and now it's really good."

More Automox Cons »

"I would like for there to be improvement when it comes to Microsoft and Windows updates. It has the ability to do it but the control of it is not there like I have in the Windows Server Update Services. The way KACE does it is still very granular. You don't really see the process like it is in the Windows Server Update Services. I think that would be one of the biggest things that I would like to see KACE really put some work into and really make that a big enhancement.""Scalability is my primary concern right now.""I would sure like them to be able to copy and paste out of OneNote. That drives me nuts. You can't copy from OneNote into KACE.""The KACE Go Mobile App crashes a lot, and it always has. I would love to see that get fixed because it's very convenient when it does work properly, but most of the time it does not.""KACE implemented the possibility of reducing the network speed of the KACE agent. You can set it so that it takes whatever network speed you want or you can set it to 5 Mb, to save network speed. You set it for all the computers, but it would be preferable to separate between VPN connections in our home office and the local area. It would be great to be able to set separate speeds for different VLANs.""I still need better communication about which processes are really due and which processes are currently being processed. According to the initial setup service provider, there is still no real management or overview on KACE where you can really see 100 percent of what is going on as well as what is going to be processed next and whether I can influence the overall process. It could really help me if I knew, e.g. exactly in 10 minutes my colleague will be supplied with this or that software. I haven't found this yet. If they could add this, that would be cool. It is still missing and I haven't yet found something like this.""There isn't a lot they need to improve with the solution itself at this point. It is pretty close to providing a single pane of glass for everything that we need for endpoint management specifically on all devices. There is very little that it doesn't provide for us, and for those, we have to go to other methods. There are some of the patching solutions that it doesn't take care of for us. So, we have to do those manually on the devices, and that's really the biggest thing. It doesn't do patching really well for non-Microsoft applications. The major application updates, particularly Windows updates, don't function nearly as well, but, for the vast majority of things, it does just fine. If they could improve in this aspect, that'd be great, but I don't know if they're going to be able to do that.""There is always room for improvement. However, the system does most of what we need at this moment."

More Quest KACE Systems Management Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing."""The product is a great value.""Its licensing for a year was nine grand. There was no additional fee.""We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use.""We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee.""The cost is very reasonable compared to the competition.""There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased.""The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."

More Automox Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Licensing is done on a per device basis, so it's dependent on how many agents you've got installed.""The pricing is great. It's billed annually and it's very reasonable.""Their pricing is per end-point device. There is an initial cost for the license for the server, which is pretty low, and then there is a per end-point device license, which is also fairly low. So, the pricing is still reasonable.""n terms of pricing and licensing, my advice is that you need to assess what you need and then look at what they offer. It's easy to get caught up in the things that you want, but don't really need.""Based on other solutions that we had implemented, its pricing seems to be quite competitive. It is not inexpensive, but it is also not more expensive than any other solution. They have the standard licensing fees and support fees.""The pricing and licensing are absolutely fair.""Licensing is very straightforward. They don't overcomplicate it. This is not a Cisco product where you have to have 30 different licenses just to open the box. It's pretty much set-and-forget. You pay an annual license... The cost is in the mid to upper range, but the ROI exceeds the outside cost, especially once you've had the system for a while.""We pay annually for technical support."

More Quest KACE Systems Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The biggest improvement to our organization involves the reduction in its man hours... We've probably saved hundreds of hours.
Top Answer: The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us. We got in early and then they had a little price rise. Overall for the price that they charge now, you get your money's worth on it. For us… more »
Top Answer: We would like to see additional detailed reporting for Service providers like us. We had to build our own reports via their APIs to meet our needs.
Top Answer: I can reach people now that I couldn't have reached previously. We are saving about 25 percent in time.
Top Answer: We buy consulting fees from Software Factory, then we pay extra for it.
Top Answer: I still need better communication about which processes are really due and which processes are currently being processed. According to the initial setup service provider, there is still no real… more »
Ranking
5th
out of 23 in Patch Management
Views
834
Comparisons
478
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
2,580
Rating
9.1
3rd
out of 23 in Patch Management
Views
5,073
Comparisons
3,393
Reviews
20
Average Words per Review
1,601
Rating
8.8
Comparisons
Also Known As
Dell KACE Systems Management
Learn More
Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

The KACE Systems Management Appliance provides a growing organization with comprehensive management of network-connected devices, including servers, PCs, Macs, Chromebooks, tablets, printers, storage, networking gear and the Internet of Things (IoT). KACE can fulfill all of the organization's systems management needs, from initial deployment to ongoing management and retirement.

Offer
Learn more about Automox
Learn more about Quest KACE Systems Management
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Waypoint, Mattos Filho, Meetic, Gems Education, Green Clinic HealthSystem, Service King
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider18%
Insurance Company5%
Legal Firm5%
REVIEWERS
University30%
Financial Services Firm17%
Government9%
Computer Software Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government7%
Manufacturing Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business67%
Midsize Enterprise33%
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise52%
Large Enterprise22%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise73%
Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Quest KACE Systems Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automox is ranked 5th in Patch Management with 9 reviews while Quest KACE Systems Management is ranked 3rd in Patch Management with 22 reviews. Automox is rated 9.2, while Quest KACE Systems Management is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Automox writes "Keeps ours clients up to date with patch automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest KACE Systems Management writes "We can see everything for the endpoint management of devices using a single interface". Automox is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, BigFix, Jamf Pro and VMware Workspace ONE, whereas Quest KACE Systems Management is most compared with Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, BigFix, Kaseya VSA and Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac. See our Automox vs. Quest KACE Systems Management report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.