Avada Software Infrared360 vs Oracle BAM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Avada Software Logo
265 views|149 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
98 views|68 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avada Software Infrared360 and Oracle BAM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, TIBCO, Aurea and others in Business Activity Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Activity Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs."
  • "Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years."
  • "Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase)."
  • "Start small, then increase licensing later as per your demand."
  • More Avada Software Infrared360 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    265
    Comparisons
    149
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    98
    Comparisons
    68
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Activity Monitoring
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, TIBCO, Aurea and others in Business Activity Monitoring. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Infrared360
    BAM
    Learn More
    Avada Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Avada Software specializes in Enterprise Middleware solutions. Founded by some pioneers in SOA, MQ and J2EE technology, Avada’s Flagship product, Infrared360, is a holistic & innovative private cloud enabled portal providing self-service administration, monitoring, load testing, auditing & statistical reporting for Enterprise Middleware including IBM’s middleware stack of MQ, IIB (message broker), WAS, and Datapower, as well as other applications servers such as  JBoss, TC Server, Weblogic, and other messaging technologies such as Tibco EMS and Kafka*.

    Accessed via any web browser on any device, Infrared360 is a single web application, yet scales to 2500+ endpoints without deploying anything (no agents, no scripts) to those endpoints.

    Using trusted ‘spaces’ and delegated visibility and control, the portal uniquely provides different business units or even different application users virtual ‘spaces’ in which to work.  Within those spaces are only the objects and resources the user has been granted visibility.  Role policy dictates permissions on those resources.

    It is the ONLY Enterprise Messaging Solution with a built in SOA engine that lets you leverage internal and external services for managing and correcting problems within your middleware messaging environment.                 

      *Kafka coming soon 

    Oracle Business Activity Monitoring (Oracle BAM) gives business users the ability to create their own dashboards and monitor their business services and processes in the enterprise. Oracle BAM supports both "active" real-time, changing dashboards that update without having to refresh the browser and also "tactical" dashboards that allow a user to change parameters to see a new perspective of the data without having to develop a database query.
    Sample Customers
    USBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin,  Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others
    glh Hotels, Silver Diner, Smiles S.A., Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries, SIBS, PARI Medical Holding GmbH, ec4u expert consulting AG, Natura Cosmeticos S.A., Portobello S.A., Algar Telecom S.A., Trombini Embalagens S.A.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm73%
    Government27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Insurance Company11%
    Transportation Company8%
    Computer Software Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise80%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Activity Monitoring
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, TIBCO, Aurea and others in Business Activity Monitoring. Updated: March 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Avada Software Infrared360 is ranked 6th in Business Activity Monitoring while Oracle BAM is ranked 7th in Business Activity Monitoring. Avada Software Infrared360 is rated 8.8, while Oracle BAM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Avada Software Infrared360 writes "An offsite team performs a daily infrastructure health check and sends reports to the technical/management teams. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BAM writes "Can be fed information from existing database tables, JMS feeds, PL/SQL, BPM and SOA projects". Avada Software Infrared360 is most compared with IBM MQ and Dynatrace, whereas Oracle BAM is most compared with Amazon EventBridge, Software AG Apama and IBM MQ.

    See our list of best Business Activity Monitoring vendors and best Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.