We performed a comparison between Avaya Wireless [EOL] and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN."The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The simplicity is great."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The WOS makes management and troubleshooting easier."
"For Meraki, the ease of deployment and management is most valuable."
"The graphic user interface is very nice."
"I can control any number of sites globally with a lean IT team."
"It makes the process much easier by providing visibility and centralized control over the network."
"It is very handy to have a support number to call."
"Its ability to be cloud-managed is the most valuable feature so if there's a reconfiguration or an issue, we have excellent visibility into the network and we can usually resolve the problem online without having to go onsite."
"With Cisco products and third-party products, integration of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is good."
"The solution is fast."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"The solution is expensive."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The price could be better."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"Improving third-party integration is key for Juniper Mist's next release."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Avaya's APs were OEM with firmware provided by another firm. Reporting issues were slow and painful."
"Unfortunately, we have to deal with European privacy laws and as far as we can see, the solution is not compliant with these. It's why we're not able to continue with Cisco Meraki. They need to become compliant with GDPR laws."
"Its price could be improved."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"I would like to see more cybersecurity. I would like the ability to go in and enhance security. Because WPA2 is becoming obsolete, many devices are now WPA3, but the challenge is that a lot of devices are not yet there. I would like to be able to go in and do monitoring, similar to ASPM. ASPM has the ability to monitor who's joining and who's active. It supports two-step monitoring. The stability of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN can also be improved."
"We haven't had any issues with the solution. We like the way it works. There isn't anything I can think of that makes me worry that it might be lacking in a certain area."
"There is a processing limitation when you have multiple SSIDs, above three or four."
"The technical support for Meraki needs improvements made to the waiting times."
"When it comes to switching, Meraki lacks categories of features."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Avaya Wireless [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Wireless LAN while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews. Avaya Wireless [EOL] is rated 3.0, while Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Avaya Wireless [EOL] writes "Reporting issues are slow and painful and it needs a controller ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". Avaya Wireless [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud, Ruckus Wireless and Cisco Wireless.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
