We performed a comparison between Avaya Wireless [EOL] and Cisco Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cisco, Ruckus and others in Wireless LAN."The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The solution is stable."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The WOS makes management and troubleshooting easier."
"The product enables mobility and centralized control."
"It always runs, and it's very reliable in terms of performance."
"The mobility that it provides is really helpful."
"I like that Cisco Wireless is easy to implement. If you get stuck with any issues, they have ample documentation on the internet. It's easy to implement, and Cisco documentation is easily accessible."
"The product offers educational licenses that are priced very reasonably."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"Its stability is most valuable."
"The main features are that it's secure and it's easy to distribute the SSID and control it. I also like the controller."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"Avaya's APs were OEM with firmware provided by another firm. Reporting issues were slow and painful."
"The internet speed is high within environments. As you move further away from the access point, there is a decline in speed. Omada or Ruckus don’t have the speed degradation as you move away from the access point."
"It requires a few tweaks in order to stabilize it. Its portal is complex. Cisco solutions are complex in general."
"In the next release, I would like to see some AI capability deployed. Other competitors like Mist and Juniper already have it. So, AI features need to be introduced next year."
"The pricing of the solution is expensive if you compare it to other competitors."
"The solution could be cheaper and have a better web interface."
"Cisco is costlier relative to other solutions."
"No product can be a ten out of ten and there are some security issues."
"The current issue with Cisco is I don't have centralized management."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Avaya Wireless [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Wireless LAN while Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 145 reviews. Avaya Wireless [EOL] is rated 3.0, while Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Avaya Wireless [EOL] writes "Reporting issues are slow and painful and it needs a controller ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Allows us to deploy a wide range of wireless products with stable WiFi". Avaya Wireless [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Omada Access Points.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
