Avencis SSO [EOL] vs Imprivata OneSign comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Systancia Logo
views| comparisons
Imprivata Logo
1,072 views|632 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avencis SSO [EOL] and Imprivata OneSign based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Avencis SSO [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."
  • "At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."
  • More Imprivata OneSign Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution.
    Top Answer:They provide a license key. I am not able to disclose the pricing information. At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Single Sign-On (SSO)
    12th
    Views
    1,072
    Comparisons
    632
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    364
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management
    Learn More
    Systancia
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Avencis SSOX offers a solution to SSO (Single Sign-On) complete, simple and non-intrusive.

    Imprivata OneSign delivers fast, secure no-click-access to the applications and information that care providers need, whenever and wherever they need it.

    Security and regulatory compliance requirements mandate user authentication technology for accessing workstations and applications. As a result, care providers need to enter unique usernames and passwords (or PINs) for order signing, documentation signing, medication reconciliation and most other applications throughout their workflow. These laborious login requirements can disrupt clinical focus and obstruct patient care.

    Sample Customers
    Air France / KLM, AFPA, A_roports de Paris, Air Liquide Sant_, SNCF, Solystic, Soregies, R_my Cointreau, Rhodia, Roquette, Thals, VilmorinCHR Metz Thionville, CHU Limoges, CHU Nancy, CHU Rennes, CHU de Rouen, GRITA, Syndicat Interhospitalier du Limousin, Hospices Civils de Lyon, AZNetwork, Banque Cantonale de Neuchatel, Banque Accord, CNP Assurances, Cr_dit Coop_ratif, Cr_dit Logement, Dexia, Dynacit_, Conseil G_n_ral de Haute-Marne, Conseil G_n_ral de la Moselle, Conseil G_n_ral de la Somme, Conseil G_n_ral du Val de Marne, F_d_ration des Entreprises Romandes, Mairie de Talant
    AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Healthcare Company21%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise48%
    Large Enterprise34%
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Avencis SSO [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Single Sign-On (SSO) while Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. Avencis SSO [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". Avencis SSO [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Auth0.

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.