Compare Avere vs. Nasuni

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Avere Logo
187 views|137 comparisons
Nasuni Logo
2,598 views|2,198 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is around $850 per terabyte per year. Any additional costs that you would incur are for the local caching devices that you'll need to access Nasuni. You kind of provide your own virtual machines or compute to access the data. You also pay for the object storage. So, there are three parts to it. There is the Nasuni license per terabyte. You would also pay for the actual object storage in the cloud, and then you would pay for virtual machines to access the storage."

More Nasuni Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage Gateways solutions are best for your needs.
509,570 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The global file locking feature is valuable. The ability to quickly deploy new sites is also valuable.
Top Answer: It is around $850 per terabyte per year. Any additional costs that you would incur are for the local caching devices that you'll need to access Nasuni. You kind of provide your own virtual machines or… more »
Top Answer: Room for improvement would be the speed of replication of new files. I would also like to see cloud mirroring.
Average Words per Review
Average Words per Review
Popular Comparisons
Learn More

Avere FXT Edge filers with FlashCloud make getting data into and out of the cloud simple and easy. FlashCloud provides the ability to translate NAS protocols to object APIs and object APIs to NAS protocols. This gives non-native applications the ability to access data stored in public and private clouds.

Nasuni combines storage, backup and disaster recovery into a single solution. No additional backup software is necessary. With multiple copies of every snapshot stored in the cloud across multiple geographies, in locations of the company’s choosing, the enterprise is fully protected in case of a disaster. A full restore is as simple as starting up a virtual machine.

Learn more about Avere
Learn more about Nasuni
Sample Customers
Teradyne, Jam Filled, Inova Translational Medicine Institute, Eight VFX, H3 Biomedicine
Environmental Systems Design Inc., Imagination, Lewis Group of Companies, Saint Michaels College, TBG Partners, Sedgwick LLP, Barry Isett & Associates, Perkins+Will
Top Industries
No Data Available
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company11%
Manufacturing Company9%

Avere is ranked 7th in Cloud Storage Gateways while Nasuni is ranked 3rd in Cloud Storage Gateways with 1 review. Avere is rated 0.0, while Nasuni is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nasuni writes "A very stable and scalable solution with the global file locking feature and the ability to quickly deploy new sites". Avere is most compared with AWS Storage Gateway, whereas Nasuni is most compared with Panzura, Qumulo, AWS Storage Gateway, Egnyte Connect and NetApp Cloud Backup.

See our list of best Cloud Storage Gateways vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.