We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Aviatrix vs. Meraki SD-WAN

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aviatrix Logo
1,032 views|766 comparisons
Meraki SD-WAN Logo
7,266 views|5,722 comparisons
Top Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Meraki solutions come with a choice of several different subscription options including one year, three years, five years, seven years, and ten years.""The licensing fees are approximately $1,000 USD annually.""The pricing is fair, but if they can make it less it would be even more attractive.""Any license you buy until January 2021 gets you an extra year for that purchase.""like everything else, it's negotiable.""If you purchase a Meeraki box, you have to purchase a license, and it's already the basic license, you will have you SD-WAN included.""This solution is more expensive than competitors."

More Meraki SD-WAN Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Networking (SDN) solutions are best for your needs.
540,884 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: We have found the product to be quite scalable.
Top Answer: This solution is more expensive than competitors.
Top Answer: With Meraki, it's more of a basic connectivity. It doesn't have all the feature sets that a Cisco SD-WAN solution has. It's limited. The product needs to offer connectivity in the major clouds due to… more »
Ranking
Views
1,032
Comparisons
766
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
7,266
Comparisons
5,722
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
627
Rating
8.1
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

The Aviatrix solution consists of two components: the Aviatrix Gateway, which is deployed on-premises or in the cloud; and the Aviatrix Cloud Controller, which orchestrates and manages one or more Gateways.

Software-defined WAN is a new approach to network connectivity that lowers operational costs and improves resource usage for multi-site deployments, allowing network administrators to use bandwidth more efficiently and ensure the highest possible level of performance for critical applications without sacrificing security or data privacy. For more information on deploying and configuring SD-WAN on the Meraki MX Security Appliance, see the Meraki SD-WAN Deployment Guide.

Offer
Learn more about Aviatrix
Learn more about Meraki SD-WAN
Sample Customers
Hyatt, Robert Half, GREE
École Jeannine Manuel
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider33%
Computer Software Company17%
Media Company10%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider38%
Educational Organization15%
Financial Services Firm15%
Logistics Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider37%
Computer Software Company22%
Retailer4%
Construction Company4%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise33%

Aviatrix is ranked 9th in Software Defined Networking (SDN) while Meraki SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined Networking (SDN) with 22 reviews. Aviatrix is rated 0.0, while Meraki SD-WAN is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Meraki SD-WAN writes "Ultimate flexibility in this solution lends opportunities for creative problem solving and cost savings". Aviatrix is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, VMware NSX, IBM SDN, Big Switch Networks and Juniper Contrail Networking, whereas Meraki SD-WAN is most compared with VMware SD-WAN, Cisco SD-WAN, Versa FlexVNF, Cradlepoint NetCloud and HPE SDN.

See our list of best Software Defined Networking (SDN) vendors.

We monitor all Software Defined Networking (SDN) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.