• Home
  • AWS AppSync vs. webMethods.io Integration

AWS AppSync vs webMethods.io Integration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo

AWS AppSync

Read 1 AWS AppSync review
403 views|207 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Software AG Logo

webMethods.io Integration

Read 7 webMethods.io Integration reviews
373 views|312 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Data Integration
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS AppSync and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Data Integration Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
VikasAgarwal
Innovative, works well with GraphQL, and can connect to any type of data source
Berniem Elfrink
Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable
The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Support for multiple data sources and formats is a fantastic feature."

More AWS AppSync Pros →

"The solution is scalable.""Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature.""There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility.""Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration.""I like the tool's scalability.""The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product.""It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."

More webMethods.io Integration Pros →

Cons
"Moving to other clouds is impossible without significantly rearchitecting your applications."

More AWS AppSync Cons →

"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved.""It is difficult to maintain.""The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required.""webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors.""The solution's release management feature could be better.""I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier.""The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."

More webMethods.io Integration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis, and it is a pay-as-you-go model."

    • More AWS AppSync Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is a yearly license."
  • "webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

    • More webMethods.io Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about webMethods.io Integration?
    Top Answer:The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What needs improvement with webMethods.io Integration?
    Top Answer:The main reason my company decided to replace webMethods.io Integration is because of the integration capabilities in the newer versions of the tool. Whenever there is a new version of webMethods.io… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for webMethods.io Integration?
    Top Answer:In my company, the solution is used for SAP Integration.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    Ranking
    25th
    out of 42 in Cloud Data Integration
    Views
    403
    Comparisons
    207
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    22nd
    out of 42 in Cloud Data Integration
    Views
    373
    Comparisons
    312
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    416
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AppSync
    webMethods Integration Cloud, Software AG webMethods Integration Cloud
    Learn More
    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Software AG
    Overview

    AWS AppSync simplifies application development by letting you create a flexible API to securely access, manipulate, and combine data from one or more data sources. AppSync is a managed service that uses GraphQL to make it easy for applications to get exactly the data they need.

    With AppSync, you can build scalable applications, including those requiring real-time updates, on a range of data sources such as NoSQL data stores, relational databases, HTTP APIs, and your custom data sources with AWS Lambda. For mobile and web apps, AppSync additionally provides local data access when devices go offline, and data synchronization with customizable conflict resolution, when they are back online.

    Software AG (Frankfurt MDAX: SOW) offers Freedom as a Service. We reimagine integration, spark business transformation and enable fast innovation on the Internet of Things so you can pioneer differentiating business models. We give you the freedom to connect and integrate any technology—from app to edge. We help you free data from silos so it’s shareable, usable and powerful—enabling you to make the best decisions and unlock entirely new possibilities for growth. Software AG has more than 4,700 employees, is active in 70 countries and had revenues of € 866 million in 2018.

    Sample Customers
    ACBL, Puresec, IDT, ASU, Public Good, cookpad, ALDO, ticketmaster
    Autosen, A1 Digital, Cintas
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Data Integration
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS AppSync is ranked 25th in Cloud Data Integration while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. AWS AppSync is rated 9.0, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AWS AppSync writes "Innovative, works well with GraphQL, and can connect to any type of data source". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". AWS AppSync is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, AWS Glue, Workato and Perspectium DataSync, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.