We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool gives you the flexibility to scale up and grow. The solution is also fast to deploy."
"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."
"It helps us to reduce the cost."
"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails."
"The solution helps optimize the cost of the AWS environment."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"It efficiently handles traffic, ensuring we are not running expenses and the infrastructure is strong enough to handle the load."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."
"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."
"The solution must improve automation."
"It could be cheaper."
"The solution is not out-of-the-box and you have to study to use it. It should be more easier to use."
"The product’s security features need improvement."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 11 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 40th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.