We compared AWS Backup and Rubrik Go across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: AWS Backup is highly regarded for its flexibility and point-in-time recovery options. Users appreciate AWS Backup’s snapshot feature that allows them to back up applications to a secondary site. Rubrik Go is highly regarded for its impressive data visualization capabilities.
Room for Improvement: AWS Backup could enhance its reporting and visualization, user interface, encryption options, and troubleshooting indicators. Rubrik Go needs to address its expensive pricing and improve security visibility.
Service and Support: Some users described AWS Backup's customer service as amazing, but others noted that AWS support may take longer to resolve complex issues. Rubrik Go's support is recognized for its timely and effective resolution of customer issues.
Ease of Deployment: Users reported varying experiences setting up AWS Backup. Some said it took only a few minutes, but others said it could take up to 10 days. Rubrik Go is straightforward to set up and can be installed in just one day.
Pricing: AWS Backup’s pricing is generally regarded as reasonable and flexible. There are no licensing fees. Users are only charged for backup storage and data transfer. However, some users consider the model to be costly and complex. Rubrik Go is known for its higher pricing, which is charged on a monthly basis.
ROI: AWS Backup offers significant value by enabling backup restoration and readiness for unforeseen events. Rubrik Go offers a varying return. To obtain detailed insights, refer to user feedback or reach out to the respective providers.
Comparison Results: AWS Backup provides flexibility in services, point-in-time recovery, and seamless integration. At the same time, some users noted that AWS Backup requires specific configuration knowledge and has room for improvement in reporting and restore functionality. Rubrik Go stands out for its solid support and exceptional data visualization capabilities. Users say Rubrik Go needs to address its high cost and improve security visibility.
"It is an easy-to-use solution."
"It's very easy to configure. Since it's a managed service, it's very straightforward to set up and use. And my customers get on with it very fast."
"The most valuable features we have found are the flexibility in the services offered."
"The solution has an effective overwrite feature."
"It provides an easy data migration process from on-premise to cloud."
"It also saves costs and is quick."
"The replication in the recovery region is the most valuable feature."
"The auto-scaling feature and the time efficiency of setting up AWS Backup are the most valuable aspects for us."
"Even though the data is already in the cloud, it's an AWS, so by accessing the on-prem appliance you can still search because it is indexed from that appliance."
"It has an easy-to-use interface that is not complicated."
"The standout feature is its ransomware protection capabilities."
"Rubrik Go's best feature is data visualization."
"Rubrik Go is very simple to use."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use for backing up VMs."
"The solution is easy to install; our team just has to put together the plan, give it to IT and let them handle it. Other solutions are quite complex, but this is much simpler."
"The most valuable feature is the storage efficiency, as the storage footprint is very good."
"The AWS Backup backend reporting is a major area that needs improvement. We would be very excited if we can see some reporting, such as trends. We do understand that there are reports available for S3 Bucket, in which the AWS backend stores the data. However, if we can receive holistic reporting, then it would be very helpful for us."
"This backup tool does the full backup of the entire snapshot server. I would like to have the option to not do the full server backup."
"There could be a centralized dashboard with a reporting feature notifying us of daily backup status."
"When it comes to encrypting data, it is not so convenient."
"Its cost could be better than a few of its competitors."
"If AWS Backup were a hybrid solution that also supported on-premises backups then it would be very helpful, especially if you are doing a migration to the cloud."
"They should work on their visual capabilities."
"To create a plan and for all the configuration, one has to do multiple steps, which could be organized in a much simpler way, making the user experience better."
"You should be able to add more workloads to Rubrik Go."
"Rubrik Go's security visibility could be improved."
"The tool's pricing needs to be improved."
"I would like to see better integration with applications, such as those from Microsoft, to make backing up from those applications simpler."
"Integration with the client is something that needs to be improved."
"I believe there's room for improvement in terms of support, particularly with Tier 3 support coming from the on-call team."
"If you're going for Rubrik, you are not opting for the tape library because Rubrik doesn't have the fiber cable connected to the tape library."
"Reporting could be improved. For now, it's only exported to CSB files."
AWS Backup is ranked 5th in SaaS Backup with 21 reviews while Rubrik Go is ranked 8th in SaaS Backup with 10 reviews. AWS Backup is rated 8.0, while Rubrik Go is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Backup writes "Useful point-in-time recovery, highly scalable, and implementation straightforward". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik Go writes "Robust ransomware protection, scalability, and suitability for enterprise environments makes it a top choice for data management needs". AWS Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud, Veritas Alta SaaS Protection and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, whereas Rubrik Go is most compared with Commvault Cloud and Own Backup and Recovery. See our AWS Backup vs. Rubrik Go report.
See our list of best SaaS Backup vendors.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
