We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and AWS CodePipeline based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."The integration is a good feature."
"The solution provides good integrations."
"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."
"The integration is a good feature."
"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"The integrations are good."
"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."
"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"The integration with other applications is fabulous."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"The deployment fails sometimes."
"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."
"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."
"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."
"The support team’s response time must be improved."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while AWS CodePipeline is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 13 reviews. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI and GitHub Actions, whereas AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins and GitHub Actions.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
