We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and Concourse for VMware Tanzu based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."The integration is a good feature."
"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."
"The solution provides good integrations."
"The integration is a good feature."
"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."
"We never experienced any problems with scalability."
"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."
"The deployment fails sometimes."
"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."
"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."
"I would like to see additional support for things outside of Cloud Foundry."
AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while Concourse for VMware Tanzu is ranked 15th in Build Automation with 1 review. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while Concourse for VMware Tanzu is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Concourse for VMware Tanzu writes "This solution is scalable and stable, but needs more support for deployments outside of Cloud Foundry". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas Concourse for VMware Tanzu is most compared with Jenkins, Tekton, GitLab, TeamCity and Bamboo.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
