AWS CodeBuild vs DBmaestro Database Release and Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and DBmaestro Database Release and Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty
Use DBmaestro Database Release and Automation?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay a monthly licensing fee."
  • "Despite the cost, it is worth the investment."
  • More AWS CodeBuild Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The integration is a good feature.
    Top Answer:They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    781
    Comparisons
    724
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    9.0
    36th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    50
    Comparisons
    39
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CodeBuild
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers. CodeBuild scales continuously and processes multiple builds concurrently, so your builds are not left waiting in a queue. You can get started quickly by using prepackaged build environments, or you can create custom build environments that use your own build tools. With CodeBuild, you are charged by the minute for the compute resources you use.

    Publish releases quickly, prevent accidental overrides, and reduce application downtime caused by database-related errors, all while maintaining stability, scalability, and security.

    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Anthem, ING Bank Turkey, Isracard, Clalbit Systems, Israel Ministry of Education
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Insurance Company6%
    Government6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise61%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while DBmaestro Database Release and Automation is ranked 36th in Build Automation. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while DBmaestro Database Release and Automation is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas DBmaestro Database Release and Automation is most compared with .

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.