We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and Inedo BuildMaster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."
"The integration is a good feature."
"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."
"The integration is a good feature."
"The solution provides good integrations."
"Technical support is quick to respond. I haven't had any issues with them."
"The deployment fails sometimes."
"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."
"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."
"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."
"The documentation should be better. It should be very easy to call REST APIs, and the documentation has to be perfect for that."
AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while Inedo BuildMaster is ranked 21st in Build Automation with 1 review. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while Inedo BuildMaster is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inedo BuildMaster writes "Deployment agent that allows us to deploy out to various other servers but doesn't provide build automation". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas Inedo BuildMaster is most compared with .
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
