We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and JFrog Pipeline based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."The solution provides good integrations."
"The integration is a good feature."
"The integration is a good feature."
"Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point with the additional pipelines making it more interesting to see what is happening across your development process in a single pane of glass."
"The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug with any of our favorite tools."
"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."
"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."
"They could work on reducing the number of permissions required while using Bitbucket."
Earn 20 points
AWS CodeBuild is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 2 reviews while JFrog Pipeline is ranked 22nd in Build Automation. AWS CodeBuild is rated 9.0, while JFrog Pipeline is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Pipeline writes "Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas JFrog Pipeline is most compared with Jenkins, Harness, Bamboo and TeamCity.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.