Compare AWS CodeCommit vs. CollabNet Subversion Edge

AWS CodeCommit is ranked 13th in Version Control while CollabNet Subversion Edge is ranked 17th in Version Control. AWS CodeCommit is rated 0, while CollabNet Subversion Edge is rated 0. On the other hand, AWS CodeCommit is most compared with GitHub, Bitbucket and Bitbucket Server, whereas CollabNet Subversion Edge is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
13th
out of 17 in Version Control
Views
330
Comparisons
328
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
17th
out of 17 in Version Control
Views
4
Comparisons
4
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 62% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
CodeCommitSubversion Edge, CollabNet Subversion
Learn
Amazon
Digital.ai
Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Central Management
Manage access centrally for secure workflow compliance and code governance

Device Independence
View repository content from any device securely

Unlimited Repositories
Create and manage any number of Subversion repositories

Data Reliability
Backup repositories automatically based on schedules and job classes

Offer
Learn more about AWS CodeCommit
Learn more about CollabNet Subversion Edge
Sample Customers
Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
Information Not Available
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.