Compare AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AWS CodeCommit Logo
1,910 views|1,874 comparisons
GitHub Logo
3,111 views|2,356 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The private repositories are free, which is very good.""It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub.""The price of this solution is reasonable."

More GitHub Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The product has a very user-friendly interface and user-friendly security.
Top Answer: I personally use the free version. the company has the enterprise version of the solution. I'm not a part of the licensing process internally and therefore do not have details in regards to how much… more »
Top Answer: There is a bit of a learning curve. At first, you'll have to do some searching online to figure out how to perform or reverse certain actions. When we have new team members, they tend to send you a… more »
Ranking
8th
out of 14 in Version Control
Views
1,910
Comparisons
1,874
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 14 in Version Control
Views
3,111
Comparisons
2,356
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
564
Rating
8.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
CodeCommit
Learn More
Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.
Offer
Learn more about AWS CodeCommit
Learn more about GitHub
Sample Customers
Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider20%
Media Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider22%
Computer Software Company19%
Media Company10%
Government7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise58%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Liquibase and others in Version Control. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS CodeCommit is ranked 8th in Version Control while GitHub is ranked 2nd in Version Control with 9 reviews. AWS CodeCommit is rated 0.0, while GitHub is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Good technical support and highly scalable but the licensing is challenging". AWS CodeCommit is most compared with Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server, Atlassian SourceTree and Liquibase, whereas GitHub is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Helix Core, IBM Rational ClearCase and Apache Subversion.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.