AWS CodePipeline vs Concourse for VMware Tanzu comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,844 views|3,796 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
628 views|593 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Concourse for VMware Tanzu based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The integration with other applications is fabulous.""The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment.""AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing.""The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application.""In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps.""The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier.""The integrations are good.""Code deployment is the best feature."

More AWS CodePipeline Pros →

"We never experienced any problems with scalability."

More Concourse for VMware Tanzu Pros →

Cons
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors.""The setup time is a bit long.""There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base.""If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time.""If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it.""AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance.""It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks.""AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."

More AWS CodePipeline Cons →

"I would like to see additional support for things outside of Cloud Foundry."

More Concourse for VMware Tanzu Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "AWS offers free business or enterprise support services."
  • "It is a straightforward approach where you pay for the resources you consume as they offer a subscription-based licensing model."
  • "The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."
  • "AWS CodePipeline is quite affordable. I've been running around four pipelines and the cost is around one dollar per month. It rarely exceeds two dollars."
  • "Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."
  • More AWS CodePipeline Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is bundled in with Cloud Foundry so the pricing is not independent."
  • More Concourse for VMware Tanzu Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web… more »
    Top Answer:AWS does not require upfront licenses or complex payment structures. It is a straightforward approach where you pay for the resources you consume as they offer a subscription-based licensing model… more »
    Top Answer:We never experienced any problems with scalability.
    Top Answer:The solution is bundled in with Cloud Foundry so the pricing is not independent.
    Top Answer:The biggest gap for me was just that the solution is relatively tied to Cloud Foundry. If you have anything you need to deploy outside of that, it becomes burdensome. I would like to see additional… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    4,844
    Comparisons
    3,796
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    8.2
    15th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    628
    Comparisons
    593
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    246
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CodePipeline
    Pivotal Concourse, Concourse for PCF, Concourse
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

    Continuous integration for application developers:

    Concourse for VMware Tanzu is a CI/CD system remastered for teams that practice agile development and deliver frequently to one or many cloud platforms.

    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Verizon, Cerner, Zipcar, Avarteq
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Transportation Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS CodePipeline is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 13 reviews while Concourse for VMware Tanzu is ranked 15th in Build Automation with 1 review. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while Concourse for VMware Tanzu is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Concourse for VMware Tanzu writes "This solution is scalable and stable, but needs more support for deployments outside of Cloud Foundry". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas Concourse for VMware Tanzu is most compared with Jenkins, Tekton, GitLab, TeamCity and Bamboo.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.