We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."
"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."
"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."
"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."
"Code deployment is the best feature."
"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."
"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors."
"The setup time is a bit long."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
Earn 20 points
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 13 reviews while Harness is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 1 review. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while Harness is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and GoCD, whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and JFrog Pipeline.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
