AWS CodePipeline vs SemaphoreCI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,844 views|3,796 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
SemaphoreCI Logo
251 views|215 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and SemaphoreCI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "AWS offers free business or enterprise support services."
  • "It is a straightforward approach where you pay for the resources you consume as they offer a subscription-based licensing model."
  • "The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."
  • "AWS CodePipeline is quite affordable. I've been running around four pipelines and the cost is around one dollar per month. It rarely exceeds two dollars."
  • "Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."
  • More AWS CodePipeline Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web… more »
    Top Answer:The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    4,844
    Comparisons
    3,796
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    8.2
    23rd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    251
    Comparisons
    215
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CodePipeline
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

    With Semaphore, you can easily automate the process of software testing and delivery in the cloud. It is designed to be easy to use and engineered for high performance. It automatically test your app after every change, thus finding bugs before they reach your users. Whenever somebody pushes new code to GitHub or Bitbucket, Semaphore immediately runs all tests, along with any security and style checks that you’ve defined. Once you start using Semaphore, every build automatically becomes a part of the GitHub or Bitbucket pull request review process. It tests multiple projects and branches simultaneously as you push new commits. By default Semaphore automatically builds every new branch in your Git repository. Semaphore’s custom-made platform for Docker equips you with unrestricted access to latest Docker CLI toolchain, including container image caching. Safety net provided by automated CI builds: check. Next up: move even faster with continuous deployment. With a unified workflow for the entire team, Semaphore enables the team to roll-in revisions and gain feedback faster by automatically deploying verified versions of code.
    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Dribble, Art Sy, 500px, General Assembly, CrunchBase, Lexmark
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Transportation Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS CodePipeline is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 13 reviews while SemaphoreCI is ranked 23rd in Build Automation. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while SemaphoreCI is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas SemaphoreCI is most compared with CircleCI, Jenkins and GitHub Actions.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.