We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Tekton based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The integrations are good."
"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."
"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."
"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."
"Code deployment is the best feature."
"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."
"Tekton is an orchestrator. It provides seamless integration for our pipelines. It offers robust support for executing tasks within the pipeline, allowing us to set up and run pipelines quickly."
"Tekton is serverless and runs on OpenShift, and we leverage Tekton to take full advantage of the Kubernetes features such as running and scaling the solution in PaaS."
"Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively."
"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"The support team’s response time must be improved."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"Configuring Tekton requires a deep understanding of Kubernetes, which can be difficult for developers."
"There might be occasional issues with storage or cluster-level logging, which can affect production."
"It tends to occupy a significant amount of disk space on the node, which could potentially pose challenges."
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 4th in Build Automation with 13 reviews while Tekton is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 3 reviews. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while Tekton is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tekton writes "Provides seamless integration for pipelines, allowing easy setup and execution of tasks but working with YAML files in Tekton can be challenging to modify ". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Bamboo, whereas Tekton is most compared with GitLab, GitHub Actions, Harness, Travis CI and TeamCity. See our AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
