Compare AWS CodeStar vs. Chef

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AWS CodeStar Logo
866 views|839 comparisons
Chef Logo
6,628 views|4,747 comparisons
Ranking
14th
out of 31 in Build Automation
Views
866
Comparisons
839
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
3rd
out of 31 in Build Automation
Views
6,628
Comparisons
4,747
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
557
Rating
8.0
Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitLab, Chef and others in Build Automation. Updated: January 2021.
456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 53% of the time.
Compared 37% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
CodeStar
Learn
Amazon
Chef
Overview

AWS CodeStar is a cloud‑based development service that provides the tools you need to quickly develop, build, and deploy applications on AWS. With AWS CodeStar, you can set up your entire continuous delivery toolchain in minutes, allowing you to start releasing code faster. AWS CodeStar makes it easy for your whole team to work together securely, with built-in role-based policies that allow you to easily manage access and add owners, contributors, and viewers to your projects. Each AWS CodeStar project comes with a unified project dashboard and integration with Atlassian JIRA software, a third-party issue tracking and project management tool. With the AWS CodeStar project dashboard, you can easily track your entire software development process, from a backlog work item to production code deployment.

Chef, is the leader in DevOps, driving collaboration through code to automate infrastructure, security, compliance and applications. Chef provides a single path to production making it faster and safer to add value to applications and meet the demands of the customer. Deployed broadly in production by the Global 5000 and used by more than half of the Fortune 500, Chef develops 100 percent of its software as open source under the Apache 2.0 license with no restrictions on its use. Chef Enterprise Automation Stack™, a commercial distribution, is developed solely from that open source code and unifies security, compliance, infrastructure and application automation with observability. Chef provides an unequaled developer experience for the Coded Enterprise by enabling users to express infrastructure, security policies and the application lifecycle as code, modernizing development, packaging and delivery of any application to any platform. For more information, visit http://chef.io and follow @chef.

Offer
Learn more about AWS CodeStar
Learn more about Chef
Sample Customers
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks BrothersFacebook, Standard Bank, GE Capital, Nordstrom, Optum, Barclays, IGN, General Motors, Scholastic, Riot Games, NCR, Gap
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Media Company24%
Comms Service Provider16%
Insurance Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise60%
Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitLab, Chef and others in Build Automation. Updated: January 2021.
456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS CodeStar is ranked 14th in Build Automation while Chef is ranked 3rd in Build Automation. AWS CodeStar is rated 0.0, while Chef is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AWS CodeStar is most compared with AWS CodePipeline, AWS Amplify Console and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Chef is most compared with Ansible, SCCM, BigFix, BMC TrueSight Server Automation and Jenkins.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors and best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.