AWS CodeStar vs Oracle Hudson CI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
1,601 views|1,076 comparisons
Oracle Logo
104 views|82 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS CodeStar and Oracle Hudson CI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
14th
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
1,601
Comparisons
1,076
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
32nd
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
104
Comparisons
82
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CodeStar
Hudson CI
Learn More
Overview

AWS CodeStar is a cloud‑based development service that provides the tools you need to quickly develop, build, and deploy applications on AWS. With AWS CodeStar, you can set up your entire continuous delivery toolchain in minutes, allowing you to start releasing code faster. AWS CodeStar makes it easy for your whole team to work together securely, with built-in role-based policies that allow you to easily manage access and add owners, contributors, and viewers to your projects. Each AWS CodeStar project comes with a unified project dashboard and integration with Atlassian JIRA software, a third-party issue tracking and project management tool. With the AWS CodeStar project dashboard, you can easily track your entire software development process, from a backlog work item to production code deployment.

Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

  • Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
  • Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.
Sample Customers
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Virgin Media
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company17%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider9%
Government8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS CodeStar is ranked 14th in Build Automation while Oracle Hudson CI is ranked 32nd in Build Automation. AWS CodeStar is rated 0.0, while Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AWS CodeStar is most compared with AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeDeploy, Microsoft Azure DevOps, AWS Amplify and GitLab, whereas Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with Jenkins.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.