AWS CodeStar vs Travis CI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
1,733 views|1,167 comparisons
Travis CI Logo
635 views|776 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS CodeStar and Travis CI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use AWS CodeStar?
Anonymous User
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
14th
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
1,733
Comparisons
1,167
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
17th
out of 41 in Build Automation
Views
635
Comparisons
776
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Tekton logo
Compared 57% of the time.
GitLab logo
Compared 19% of the time.
Jenkins logo
Compared 19% of the time.
TeamCity logo
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
CodeStar
Learn More
Overview

AWS CodeStar is a cloud‑based development service that provides the tools you need to quickly develop, build, and deploy applications on AWS. With AWS CodeStar, you can set up your entire continuous delivery toolchain in minutes, allowing you to start releasing code faster. AWS CodeStar makes it easy for your whole team to work together securely, with built-in role-based policies that allow you to easily manage access and add owners, contributors, and viewers to your projects. Each AWS CodeStar project comes with a unified project dashboard and integration with Atlassian JIRA software, a third-party issue tracking and project management tool. With the AWS CodeStar project dashboard, you can easily track your entire software development process, from a backlog work item to production code deployment.

Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes. Travis CI for private repositories has plans for every size project. With Travis CI testing your open source project is 100% free.
Sample Customers
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Facebook, Heroku, Mozilla, Zendesk, twitter, Rails
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company17%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider8%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider7%
Healthcare Company7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise68%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise67%
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS CodeStar is ranked 14th in Build Automation while Travis CI is ranked 17th in Build Automation. AWS CodeStar is rated 0.0, while Travis CI is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Travis CI writes "Bamboo vs. Travis CI vs. Circle CI vs. Codeship". AWS CodeStar is most compared with AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeDeploy, Microsoft Azure DevOps, AWS Amplify and Jenkins, whereas Travis CI is most compared with Tekton, GitLab, Jenkins and TeamCity.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.