We performed a comparison between AWS Cost Management [EOL] and Google Cloud Billing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management."I like the recommendation we get from AWS Cost Management to use a particular image or VM type."
"The product provides the ability to set cost limits and budgets for a set of resources on the network."
"The stability and scalability are good."
"The initial setup wasn't complex at all."
"AWS Cost Management is good for providing in-depth information in one place."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It's not complex at all."
"The tool's cost management feature provides a comprehensive view of AWS costs, allowing us to plan and make cost-effective decisions. With AWS Cost Explorer, we can perform cost planning, generate recommendations, and provide clients with suggestions for resizing. This feature includes data filtering and protection, offering users insights into spending patterns through AWS spending patterns and planning tools. The product is easy to learn."
"With the cost management tool, clients can optimize fine tuning their consumption."
"We use Google Cloud Billing to pay for or renew the license of our Google Workspace products."
"What I like most about this solution is that it's easy."
"It is a stable product."
"We need finer-grained control over the roles and policies for users, specifying their permissions as to what they can look at."
"The solution needs to have its own dashboard for seeing details on it. It should be customizable as well so I have the ability to pull up the information I need to see and have it in one place for my reference. I should just be able to click and see everything I need in one step."
"Data transfer between S3 buckets within AWS incurs costs, especially when moving data from one bucket to another or downloading data."
"There could be an option to build custom dashboards for the platform."
"This program is not very scalable."
"AWS Cost Management has fewer features compared to Azure Cost Management."
"AWS could improve the compatibility with other products."
"I would like to see the forecasting models improved with AWS Cost Management."
"Google Cloud Billing should have a more user-friendly interface."
"At times you will find that the computer engines are freezing or it's about to freeze without any notification or information and it's unable to diagnose where it is hung."
"When I want to analyze the information, it would be better, since Google knows what I have used, to only show those items for analysis purposes."
AWS Cost Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Cost Management with 10 reviews while Google Cloud Billing is ranked 10th in Cloud Cost Management with 3 reviews. AWS Cost Management [EOL] is rated 8.2, while Google Cloud Billing is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Cost Management [EOL] writes "Easy to use and provides in-depth information in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Billing writes "Simple to set up with helpful for cost management and good reliability". AWS Cost Management [EOL] is most compared with VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, IBM Turbonomic, Cloudability, Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) and Azure Cost Management, whereas Google Cloud Billing is most compared with IBM Turbonomic.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
