We performed a comparison between AWS Database Migration Service and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The database migration services allow us to do real-time synchronization of on-premise and database to plan out our releases."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the one I use for report generation. The security risk is very low."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The solution is instantaneous. We can launch the service and reduce the end number of manpower."
"It's scalable."
"This solution is very good at mini-batch processing."
"The process is now simplified because there won't be maintenance. Usually we can take a snapshot of the number I need. We can automate the backup snapshots and we can restore it very quickly. We get many benefits from the application."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."
"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."
"I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well."
"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."
"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."
"As a solution, the better thing is if more platforms come with direct compatibility, like connecting to different data sources. The basic problem I faced the most was while transferring and reading data from Excel. So, one time, I found that all the components I had declared in my scripts were able to take it. And after some patching happens, it is not able to support that. Again, we need to update the version of Excel. So, it's not like a plug-in type place where you have done the solution and are confident that it will work. So, this is an area of improvement."
"This solution can offer more tweaks where the latency can be brought down to fifteen seconds."
"The cost is a concern. We use DMS because of its simplicity, but the price could definitely be more competitive."
"Support could be more expedient. Right now I am waiting on support for an extension."
"Database Migration Service could be more integrated. I think that it makes sense to add integration to these functions. For example, AWS Glue has a feature called Orchestrator to create data flows, and that's more straightforward."
"There are a set of complexities and challenges when a user wants to integrate AWS products with Microsoft products."
"Migrating from here and pushing the data from on-premise to AWS cloud is a big challenge and a few more services from AWS would be helpful. For example, we are currently using ILDB internet tools which move data from on-premise to the AWS cloud. A few more services would be really helpful for me to move the master data."
"It would be helpful if the bandwidth could be independent of the network or if we could have a dedicated bandwidth for this product."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"This is a great solution and the vendor could improve the marketing of the solution to be able to reach more clients."
"One area that needs improvement is the version upgrade process. Many customers I've worked with encounter challenges when transitioning from their current version, such as x or 9, to a newer version. The process is not smooth, and they must shift their entire website."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
More AWS Database Migration Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Database Migration Service is ranked 2nd in Cloud Data Integration with 27 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. AWS Database Migration Service is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Database Migration Service writes "A cloud solution for live replication but has stability issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". AWS Database Migration Service is most compared with AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate, Qlik Replicate, Fivetran and Confluent, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our AWS Database Migration Service vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.