We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AWS Glue's most valuable features are the data catalog, including crawlers and tables, and Glue Studio, which means you don't have to use custom code."
"The most valuable features currently are glue studio, jobs, and triggers."
"The solution integrates well with other AWS products or services."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is scalability."
"I like its integration and ability to handle all data-related tasks."
"Glue is a NoSQL-based data ETL tool that has some advantages over IIS and ISAs."
"What I like best about AWS Glue is its real-time data backup feature. Last week, there was a production push, and what used to take almost ten days to send out around fifty-six thousand emails now takes only two hours."
"We no longer had to worry much about infrastructure management because AWS Glue is serverless, and Amazon takes care of the underlying infrastructure."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"The integration potential is excellent."
"It is a stable product...The initial setup was simple."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"While working on AWS Glue, I could not find any training material for it."
"Currently, it supports only two languages in the background: Python and Scala. From our customization point of view, it would be helpful if it can also support Java in the background."
"The product has only a few built-in transformations."
"It is not clear how the partition discovery would have been affected by more data coming in."
"The product is expensive for data streaming. This area needs improvement."
"I would like to see stable libraries at the moment they are not there."
"The start-up time is really high right now. For instance, when you start up a new job, you have to wait for five or eight minutes before it starts. If the start-up time is reduced to one or two minutes, it will be great. It will be better to have a direct linkage to Redshift in AWS. If we can use data catalogs from Redshift, it will be so easy to create some data catalogs. Currently, we can only use data catalogs from S3."
"The technical support for this solution could be improved. In future, we would like to connect more services like Athena or Kinesis to help control more loads of data."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"Mule should have better B2B integration."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"The price could be improved."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"The solution is very expensive. They need to work on the pricing."
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 39 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and Confluent. See our AWS Glue vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.