Compare AWS Glue vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Informatica, Denodo and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: July 2021.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Data catalog and triggers are the two best features for me. AWS Glue has its own data catalog, which makes it great and really easy to use. Triggers are also really good for scheduling the ETL process.""Its user interface is quite good. You just need to choose some options to create a job in AWS Glue. The code-generation feature is also useful. If you don't want to customize it and simply want to read a file and store the data in the database, it can generate the code for you.""The facility to integrate with S3 and the possibility to use Jupyter Notebook inside the pipeline are the most valuable features."

More AWS Glue Pros »

"It's very easy to get started on the solution. It's also easy to maintain, scale, and integrate according to cost factors.""The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value.""The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us""The most valuable feature is the ease of customization.""The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial""It has a number of pre-built connectors. Its flow designer is also valuable. It provides the ease of promotion between environments and the ease of connection management. It is also stable and easy to scale and deploy.""OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces.""In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."

More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pros »

Cons
"The start-up time is really high right now. For instance, when you start up a new job, you have to wait for five or eight minutes before it starts. If the start-up time is reduced to one or two minutes, it will be great. It will be better to have a direct linkage to Redshift in AWS. If we can use data catalogs from Redshift, it will be so easy to create some data catalogs. Currently, we can only use data catalogs from S3.""Currently, it supports only two languages in the background: Python and Scala. From our customization point of view, it would be helpful if it can also support Java in the background.""The crucial problem with AWS Glue is that it only works with AWS. It is not an agnostic tool like Pentaho. In PowerCenter, we can install the forms from Google and other vendors, but in the case of AWS Glue, we can only use AWS."

More AWS Glue Cons »

"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release.""Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define.""They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners""Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced.""The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM.""It lacks configurable time-outs on connections. Configurable time-outs is an important nonfunctional property that it is currently missing. I have also written about it in an article, and I have also submitted some enhancement requests. Its visual designer could be a bit more responsive. It would also be good to get more XSLT editing capabilities.""Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good.""The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."

More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing is a bit higher than other solutions like Athena and EC2. If the pricing becomes more scaled or flexible, it will be good because you have to pay 44 cents just for one DPU for an hour. If you increase DPUs to 5 or 10, the pricing gets multiplied. There are also some time limits like 0 to 10 minutes or 10 to 20 minutes. If the pricing is according to the minutes, it would be better because you have to limit your job to 10 minutes or 20 minutes.""It is not expensive. AWS Glue works on the serverless architecture. We get charged for the time the server is up. For our use case, we have to use it once in a day, and it is not expensive for us.""Its price is good. We pay as we go or based on the usage, which is a good thing for us because it is simple to forecast for the tool. It is good in terms of the financial planning of the company, and it is a good way to estimate the cost. It is also simple for our clients. In my opinion, it is one of the best tools in the market for ETL processes because of the fact that you pay as you use, which separates it from other big tools such as PowerCenter, Pentaho Data Integration, and Talend."

More AWS Glue Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It has different licensing models. The most upfront and most transparent is the pay-as-you-go model. It also has a certain messages-per-hour limit. There is a certain amount that is charged per hour, and a certain number of messages are included in it, which you can scale up as you go. Its licensing is very competent and easy.""In the case of Oracle Integration Cloud, costs can be "predictable" as far as the platform and infrastructure are concerned."

More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
Top Answer: The facility to integrate with S3 and the possibility to use Jupyter Notebook inside the pipeline are the most valuable features.
Top Answer: Its price is good. We pay as we go or based on the usage, which is a good thing for us because it is simple to forecast for the tool. It is also good in terms of the financial planning of the company… more »
Top Answer: In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files.
Top Answer: Many open-source products can offer a high level of customizability and no upfront licensing cost. However, there can be a high cost involved in provisioning infrastructure, expertise, and other… more »
Top Answer: Improvements can be made in several areas, as follows: * Configurable timeouts on each connection would be better than a single global timeout that applies to all. The rationale for why timeouts are… more »
Ranking
7th
Views
7,833
Comparisons
6,668
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
591
Rating
7.7
Views
7,549
Comparisons
6,000
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
703
Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Oracle ICS
Learn More
Overview

AWS Glue is a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy for customers to prepare and load their data for analytics. You can create and run an ETL job with a few clicks in the AWS Management Console. You simply point AWS Glue to your data stored on AWS, and AWS Glue discovers your data and stores the associated metadata (e.g. table definition and schema) in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. Once cataloged, your data is immediately searchable, queryable, and available for ETL.

Oracle Integration Cloud Service (ICS) delivers best in class “Hybrid” Integration. ICS is a simple and powerful integration platform in the cloud to maximize the value of your investments in SaaS and on-premises applications. It includes an intuitive web based integration designer for point and click integration between applications and a rich monitoring dashboard that provides real-time insight into the transactions, all running on a mature runtime platform on Oracle Public Cloud. ICS will help accelerate integration projects and significantly shorten the time-to-market through it's intuitive and simplified designer, an intelligent data mapper, and a library of adapters to connect to various applications.

Offer
Learn more about AWS Glue
Learn more about Oracle Integration Cloud Service
Sample Customers
bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Media Company16%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company49%
Comms Service Provider10%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise36%
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Informatica, Denodo and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: July 2021.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS Glue is ranked 7th in Cloud Data Integration with 3 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 10 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.6, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Improved our time to implement a new ETL process and has a good price and scalability, but only works with AWS". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "Good flow design interface, scalable, and provides a good variety of connectors". AWS Glue is most compared with Talend Open Studio, Informatica PowerCenter, AWS Database Migration Service, IBM InfoSphere DataStage and SSIS, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Matillion ETL.

See our list of .

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.