We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Toad Data Point based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the visual interface of AWS Glue."
"The solution helps organizations gain flexibility in defining the structure of the data."
"I like the fact that AWS Glue works with Python scripts."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is scalability."
"I like its integration and ability to handle all data-related tasks."
"One of the best features of the solution is its ability to easily integrate with other AWS services."
"The solution integrates well with other AWS products or services."
"AWS Glue's most valuable features are the data catalog, including crawlers and tables, and Glue Studio, which means you don't have to use custom code."
"The most valuable features of Toad Data are you could write a parameterized query and it wouldn't error out, it would give you the parameters that you could input. The auto-formatting feature is useful because it was great for keeping your queries neat and understandable. The auto comment, and uncomment toggles that you could do were convenient."
"The Connectivity and Connection Manager supports a broad number of connection types, and it is trivial for end-users to set up their own connections to sources."
"Only people who can code, either in Java or Python, can use the product freely. Those who don't know Java or Python might find using AWS Glue difficult."
"On occasion, the solution's dashboard reports that a project failed due to runtime but it actually succeeded."
"Glue could perform better. It sometimes takes too long to test a Glue job. Google Cloud Platform offers more Python scripts than AWS."
"In terms of performance, if they can further optimize the execution time for serverless jobs, it would be a welcome improvement."
"I haven't looked into Glue in terms of seeking out flaws. I've not come across missing features."
"If there's a cluster-related configuration, we have to make worker notes, which is quite a headache when processing a large amount of data."
"The solution should offer features for streaming data in addition to batching data."
"I have encountered challenges with multi-region support."
"On the scheduling server, some scheduled reports just sit there and never execute for the first time. After manually executing the first time, they run with no issues."
"Toad Data could improve by having additional features, such as query prediction. This could help someone who's not the strongest programmer. If the software could help them write queries correctly it would be very helpful, especially for small development teams or teams that lack the input skills necessary to write and program efficiently."
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Toad Data Point is ranked 38th in Data Integration with 2 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Toad Data Point is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Toad Data Point writes "Easy to learn, good connectivity to multiple data sources, and helpful supprt". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas Toad Data Point is most compared with SSIS, SAS Enterprise Guide, Alteryx, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and Azure Data Factory. See our AWS Glue vs. Toad Data Point report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.