We performed a comparison between AWS IAM Identity Center and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The product is easy for beginners to learn and use."
"Fulfilled our requirement at a good price."
"We have not had issues with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. It is stable."
"The implementation has significantly improved access management within our organization."
"The initial setup is a valuable point on Fortinet products. Most of the time, putting the theory into practice on the devices is quite friendly and straightforward. As long as you can read English you can find your way around the solution and make it work. This is a high value point on Fortinet - the way everything is laid out in the web UI is user-friendly and quite straightforward. The UI is quite simple."
"Valuable features include the robust SSO features, when you have more complicated authentication within an organization. We can mix AD, Radius, Portal, SSO Portals (Google, etc.), and build our own environment. It is very flexible."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication."
"Enables easy integration, allowing for 2FA with our VPN."
"The two-step authentication provides a higher level of security."
"In the product, two groups cannot have the same name...In general, the tool does not allow for the duplication of names."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"We've had some issues with integration."
"Other features that would improve the product are a single sign-on where people can use their Gmail ID to log-in, etc."
"We would like to see Linux-based operating systems be able to integrate with FortiAuthenticator to get two-factor authentication running on them. as well. This is a shortcoming that I have faced a few times already."
"I would like to see integration and customization capabilities with the end-user portal to solve authentication issues with diverse implementation scenarios."
"The GUI is on the older side but I'm sure that it will be upgraded soon. It works, but it looks a little dated."
"It would be helpful to receive a code by yourself for authentication instead of it registered to a phone."
"FortiAuthenticator's interface could be better."
AWS IAM Identity Center is ranked 21st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 1 review while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews. AWS IAM Identity Center is rated 9.0, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS IAM Identity Center writes "Helps users provide or revoke accesses whenever needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". AWS IAM Identity Center is most compared with Red Hat Single Sign On, Microsoft Entra ID and PingFederate, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.