We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare AWS Lambda vs. Azure Stream Analytics

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AWS Lambda Logo
6,560 views|6,094 comparisons
Azure Stream Analytics Logo
7,401 views|6,475 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Amazon, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: October 2021.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"The most valuable feature is that it scans the cloud system and if they are any security anomalies it triggers an email.""The ease and speed of developing the services using any available language is the most valuable feature.""It's a serverless solution which is the best feature. It helps us because it offers free aspects. From the infrastructure perspective, it helps us manage costs. There is no overhead of estimating how much infrastructure we're going to need. We can focus on building the business functionality that we want to build.""The cool thing about AWS Lambda is that AWS does all the management. For compression, it is all about making the data small and then making it regular size again. We have an encode function and a decode function. AWS Lambda schedules each of those for us. It has a load balancer and all the fancy stuff, depending on the demand. The most valuable part of AWS Lambda is that I only need to write the software. I need to write two functions, and my cloud developer turns them into two AWS Lambda instances. That's it.""The solution is designed very well. You don't need to keep a server up. You just need some router to route your API request and Lambda provides a very well-designed feature to process the request.""Amazon takes care of the scalability. That's the right way. It's automatic and it's fully managed. That's one benefit of Lambda.""The basic feature that I like is that there is no server installation. It also has good support for various languages, such as Java, .NET, C#, and Python.""The solution is highly scalable."

More AWS Lambda Pros »

"Provides deep integration with other Azure resources.""The most valuable features are the IoT hub and the Blob storage.""Real-time analytics is the most valuable feature of this solution. I can send the collected data to Power BI in real time.""I like the IoT part. We have mostly used Azure Stream Analytics services for it""The solution has a lot of functionality that can be pushed out to companies.""Technical support is pretty helpful.""I like the way the UI looks, and the real-time analytics service is aligned to this. That can be helpful if I have to use this on a production service."

More Azure Stream Analytics Pros »

"The running time of AWS Lambda runs fine. It takes around five minutes but it would be great if that time could be extended.""The product needs some updating as far as ease-of-customization and configuration opportunities to work with solutions outside of the cloud.""If you are setting it up on hybrid solution, there is a lot of work that needs to go in.""One area of improvement is to include support for more programming languages. AWS Lambda does not support a lot of programming languages. You have to write the Lambda functions in a certain programming language. We are using C++. My developer knows a couple of other languages. Python is his favorite language, but Python is not supported in AWS Lambda.""We need to better understand Lambda for different scenarios. We need some joint effort between Amazon and the users to have the users identify how they can really leverage Lambda. It's not about Lambda itself; it's about the practice, the guidance. There needs to be very good documentation. From the user perspective, what exists now is not always enough.""I think that perhaps Lambda could explore its functionality more.""Its price should be improved. Its pricing is on the higher side. I am not sure if it currently supports the Go language. If it doesn't support the Go language, they can introduce it.""The user-friendliness of the solution could be improved."

More AWS Lambda Cons »

"If something goes wrong, it's very hard to investigate what caused it and why.""There may be some issues when connecting with Microsoft Power BI because we are providing the input and output commands, and there's a chance of it being delayed while connecting.""It is not complex, but it requires some development skills. When the data is sent from Azure Stream Analytics to Power BI, I don't have the access to modify the data. I can't customize or edit the data or do some queries. All queries need to be done in the Azure Stream Analytics.""The collection and analysis of historical data could be better.""The solution offers a free trial, however, it is too short.""Early in the process, we had some issues with stability.""Sometimes when we connect Power BI, there is a delay or it throws up some errors, so we're not sure."

More Azure Stream Analytics Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"AWS is slightly more expensive than Azure.""Its pricing is on the higher side.""The price of the solution is reasonable and it is a pay-per-use model. It is very good for cost optimization.""The cost is based on runtime.""The fees are volume-based.""AWS Lambda is inexpensive."

More AWS Lambda Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The cost of this solution is less than competitors such as Amazon or Google Cloud."

More Azure Stream Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is highly scalable.
Top Answer: The user-friendliness of the solution could be improved. If it was easy to run with the same function in other platforms, other environments, that would make it more portable. That would be really… more »
Top Answer: Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their… more »
Top Answer: In terms of pricing, you can't compare it to open source solutions. It would be higher compared to open source, of course, however, with the support and everything you're getting, I would say the… more »
Top Answer: With Azure specifically, the drawback is it is a very Azure-specific product. You can't connect it to external things out of Azure. For example, Spark or Databricks can be used in any cloud and can be… more »
out of 14 in Compute Service
Average Words per Review
out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
Average Words per Review
Also Known As
Learn More

AWS Lambda is a compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. AWS Lambda executes your code only when needed and scales automatically, from a few requests per day to thousands per second. You pay only for the compute time you consume - there is no charge when your code is not running. With AWS Lambda, you can run code for virtually any type of application or backend service - all with zero administration. AWS Lambda runs your code on a high-availability compute infrastructure and performs all of the administration of the compute resources, including server and operating system maintenance, capacity provisioning and automatic scaling, code monitoring and logging. All you need to do is supply your code in one of the languages that AWS Lambda supports (currently Node.js, Java, C# and Python).

You can use AWS Lambda to run your code in response to events, such as changes to data in an Amazon S3 bucket or an Amazon DynamoDB table; to run your code in response to HTTP requests using Amazon API Gateway; or invoke your code using API calls made using AWS SDKs. With these capabilities, you can use Lambda to easily build data processing triggers for AWS services like Amazon S3 and Amazon DynamoDB process streaming data stored in Amazon Kinesis, or create your own back end that operates at AWS scale, performance, and security.

AzureStream Analytics is a fully managed event-processing engine that lets you set up real-time analytic computations on streaming data.The data can come from devices, sensors, web sites, social media feeds, applications, infrastructure systems, and more.
Learn more about AWS Lambda
Learn more about Azure Stream Analytics
Sample Customers
Rockwell Automation, Milliman, Honeywell Building Solutions, Arcoflex Automation Solutions, Real Madrid C.F., Aerocrine, Ziosk, Tacoma Public Schools, P97 Networks
Top Industries
Computer Software Company33%
Financial Services Firm25%
Healthcare Company8%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm8%
Computer Software Company23%
Media Company21%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm7%
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider20%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise57%
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Amazon, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: October 2021.
542,721 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS Lambda is ranked 2nd in Compute Service with 16 reviews while Azure Stream Analytics is ranked 5th in Streaming Analytics with 7 reviews. AWS Lambda is rated 8.6, while Azure Stream Analytics is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Lambda writes "Programming is getting much easier and does not need a lot of configuration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Stream Analytics writes "A serverless scalable event processing engine with a valuable IoT feature". AWS Lambda is most compared with AWS Batch, Apache NiFi, Apache Spark, Apache Storm and Google Cloud Dataflow, whereas Azure Stream Analytics is most compared with Databricks, Apache Spark, Apache Flink, Apache Spark Streaming and Amazon Kinesis.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.