AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] vs Foglight Evolve Cloud comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] and Foglight Evolve Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, IBM and others in Cloud Migration.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Migration Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Foglight Evolve Cloud?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is no need to pay for any licensing since it is an open-source tool."
  • More AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's setup phase was straightforward.
    Top Answer:AWS provides a pay-as-you-go model, meaning that users only pay for the resources they use. They also offer a shared plan option at a nominal price for smaller servers. For larger servers with higher… more »
    Top Answer:We can effectively address any new challenges if we install additional components and set them up in the server because every company has different requirements.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Cloud Migration
    29th
    out of 38 in Cloud Migration
    Views
    32
    Comparisons
    21
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Server Migration Service (SMS) is an agentless service which makes it easier and faster for you to migrate thousands of on-premises workloads to AWS. AWS SMS allows you to automate, schedule, and track incremental replications of live server volumes, making it easier for you to coordinate large-scale server migrations.

    Foglight Evolve Cloud helps you migrate workloads to the cloud with confidence, with predicted costs, cost-savings and impact to performance. ... After migration, you'll be able to fully manage all your workloads in the cloud easily.

    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    American Airlines, Bank of America, BARCLAYS, ebay, Ford, intel, MARS, MERCK, Microsoft, UBER, VISA
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Insurance Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Migration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, IBM and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Migration with 5 reviews while Foglight Evolve Cloud is ranked 29th in Cloud Migration. AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] is rated 8.8, while Foglight Evolve Cloud is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] writes "A cloud solution for operating and managing the AWS Server, EC2, and S3 bucket". On the other hand, AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] is most compared with Nutanix Move, AWS Application Migration Service and Carbonite Migrate, whereas Foglight Evolve Cloud is most compared with .

    See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.