AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, IBM and others in Cloud Migration.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Migration Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is easy to use.""The tool is automatic and makes migration easy.""The solution's setup phase was straightforward.""Mature, resilient, and seamless database and server migration solution that's stable and scalable."

More AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] Pros →

"The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS Pros →

Cons
"The database schema conversion could be made more seamless for this solution. Widening the scope of features for database migration will also help.""The product's cloud security could be improved. It also needs to improve its stability.""The documentation and videos could be improved, especially in the area of migration. Live videos would be helpful. There are very limited videos available.""There is no monitoring support available in the solution."

More AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] Cons →

"We'd like the solution to be less expensive and offer lower latency."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is no need to pay for any licensing since it is an open-source tool."
  • More AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's setup phase was straightforward.
    Top Answer:AWS provides a pay-as-you-go model, meaning that users only pay for the resources they use. They also offer a shared plan option at a nominal price for smaller servers. For larger servers with higher… more »
    Top Answer:We can effectively address any new challenges if we install additional components and set them up in the server because every company has different requirements.
    Top Answer:The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful.
    Top Answer:I don't deal with the pricing. There is a separate procurement team and licensing team who manage that. I haven't seen any new investments into the product, however, I'm sure the organization has and… more »
    Top Answer:I didn't use the solution in detail to really call for more options. One of the recommended products was this solution. The storage admin that I usually work with prefers this solution. That said… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Cloud Migration
    12th
    out of 38 in Cloud Migration
    Views
    57
    Comparisons
    39
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    663
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cloud Volumes Service for AWS, NetApp CVS for AWS, CVS for AWS
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Server Migration Service (SMS) is an agentless service which makes it easier and faster for you to migrate thousands of on-premises workloads to AWS. AWS SMS allows you to automate, schedule, and track incremental replications of live server volumes, making it easier for you to coordinate large-scale server migrations.

    NetApp Cloud Volume Service for AWS is available in a monthly or annual subscription, and is a fast, secure, simple to consume file service that delivers advanced, enterprise-class management to your cloud applications. Move your applications without re-architecting.

    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Insurance Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Migration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, IBM and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Migration with 5 reviews while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is ranked 12th in Cloud Migration with 1 review. AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] is rated 8.8, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] writes "A cloud solution for operating and managing the AWS Server, EC2, and S3 bucket". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS writes "Great migrations, useful integrations, and offers good data replication". AWS Server Migration Service [EOL] is most compared with Nutanix Move, AWS Application Migration Service and Carbonite Migrate, whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is most compared with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP.

    See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.