We performed a comparison between AWS Storage Gateway and CloudArray [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Nasuni, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Panzura and others in Cloud Storage Gateways."It's a cloud storage solution, which makes it quite flexible. If you have one terabyte today and need ten tomorrow, it's not a problem."
"AWS Storage Gateway is used when there's a high requirement for storage and the company has their goal to move to the cloud and they are not comfortable having it in the data centers. They want the data to move to the cloud. We propose storage services that give them flexibility. They don't have to manage their data centers by themselves because it is being managed by Amazon or Microsoft. They do not have to worry about security and vulnerability issues. That is a strategy that companies can find value in and choose a cloud service."
"The solution has low latency."
"AWS Storage Gateway has durability."
"The most valuable feature is that it requires less utilization of space, compared to storing directly to the database of the system. It offers a unique way of doing things."
"Generally, I use AWS Storage Gateway to reduce the cost of the S3 and caching."
"The solution gives us the ability to move large amounts of data to the cloud and it gives us on-premises connectivity. Additionally, the storage can be shared from the cloud to on-premise."
"The stability is probably the most valuable aspect of the product."
"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use and the initial setup is easy and comfortable."
"It would be better for us if they improved their integration capability."
"Initial setup could be simplified and that would make the user experience better."
"The security could improve in the solution."
"I cannot say it's perfect."
"A data pipeline tool would be more beneficial for data authentication and DataOps."
"We've had issues with bandwidth in the past, and we don't know where the bottlenecks are. We're not sure if it's on the AWS side or with the clients or the configuration in between. There's no visibility."
"AWS Storage Gateway could improve by having different kinds of storage. For example, allowing all kinds of data, whether it's images or structure, not structure data. This would be great."
"Its interface could be easier to use."
"To make it a ten it should be powerful."
Earn 20 points
AWS Storage Gateway is ranked 2nd in Cloud Storage Gateways with 12 reviews while CloudArray [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Storage Gateways. AWS Storage Gateway is rated 8.0, while CloudArray [EOL] is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Storage Gateway writes "Beneficial flexibility, secure, and little maintenance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloudArray [EOL] writes "Easy to use and the initial setup is easy and comfortable". AWS Storage Gateway is most compared with Nasuni, NetApp Cloud Backup, Avere, StorSimple and Tiger Bridge, whereas CloudArray [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Cloud Storage Gateways vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Storage Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.