Compare AWS Transfer for SFTP vs. IBM Sterling File Gateway

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use AWS Transfer for SFTP? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It's reasonably priced at $800,000."

More IBM Sterling File Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer solutions are best for your needs.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable aspect is that it has good functionality.
Top Answer: It's reasonably priced at $800,000. That's the annual maintenance cost. You have to pay to expand your additional platform.
Top Answer: The areas that need improvement are user management, user interface, and the segregation of users. These are the areas that I am battling with at the moment. It's not geared towards your user… more »
Ranking
13th
Views
814
Comparisons
737
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
3rd
Views
3,591
Comparisons
2,811
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
386
Rating
6.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Learn
Amazon
IBM
Overview

AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol.

Securely manage transfer files with authentication, encryption and audit trails while you retain administrative control of data using a library of templates.

Sterling File Gateway can help you increase secure and dependable file transfer with your trading partners. It consolidates disparate centers of file transfer activity and facilitates the security-rich exchange of file-based data over the Internet. It helps companies avoid the risk and operational issues that can result from using loosely controlled file-transfer servers.

Offer
Learn more about AWS Transfer for SFTP
Learn more about IBM Sterling File Gateway
Sample Customers
Myriota, FINRA, Celgene, Kontor New Media, Belong, ThinkCX, BluTV
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm19%
Media Company17%
Comms Service Provider12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Financial Services Firm19%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS Transfer for SFTP is ranked 13th in Managed File Transfer while IBM Sterling File Gateway is ranked 3rd in Managed File Transfer with 4 reviews. AWS Transfer for SFTP is rated 0.0, while IBM Sterling File Gateway is rated 6.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Sterling File Gateway writes "The industry leader in secure file transfer, broadly adopted for its excellent capabilities". AWS Transfer for SFTP is most compared with Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, Aspera On Demand, CA XCOM Data Transport, MOVEit and Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer, whereas IBM Sterling File Gateway is most compared with Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, MOVEit, Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer, Aspera Managed File Transfer and BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.